There is absolutely nothing to worry about. I already have devised a solution to the problem.
Let us assume that CERN creates a black hole that will end the world. Due to the significant scientific information it would provide, it would warrant them a Nobel Prize. This is good and all, but now you have a situation of "the world ending", which is not so good.
So, on one side we have a group with a Nobel Prize with an "end of the world" exponent. Let us say n represents the nobel prize factor and X represents "existence". That mean we could represent the CERN group as n^-x (end of the world would be the opposite of existence and would be exponential growth as the function of X - existence).
Now, we also have Al Gore who won a Nobel Prize for saving the world. He would then be represented as n^x - nobel prize to the power of existence, also an exponential growth based on the function of x.
Now, what does this do for us?
This means, if we can then get Al Gore and the CERN scientists, with their Nobel Prize trophies, in the same room, we can apply the weights of their achievements against each other.
"But Adam, n^-x * n^x = 1. We are still lacking existence!"
And my wise and observant commentator, you would be correct! That is why we would have to increase the Al Gore factor to n^2x. Why is this so? Because when Al Gore won the Nobel Prize for saving the world, existence was already existent, so he added a growth of existence ... n^2x.
So, if we get them in the same room:
n^2x * n^-x = n^x
Q.E.D
We have a world that exists with Nobel Prizes and no black holes (or Al Gores).
__________________
|