PhillyBlog - Philadelphia  

Go Back   PhillyBlog - Philadelphia > Where We Are > The World
Blogs Map Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Google
 
Web www.phillyblog.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-20-2004, 08:47 AM
tmcgee tmcgee is offline
Water Ice Vendor
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 679
Default Afghanistan, the UN, and Opium

It's not well understood, I think, how opposed a lot of conservatives are to the War on Drugs. From the National Review's blog, "The Corner":

Quote:
THE UN PUTS THE BOOT IN [Andrew Stuttaford]

The organization may be corrupt, malign and useless, but is it too much to expect that the UN will not set out actively to wreck Afghanistan's new democracy? It seems that it is.. Read this report from the Independent and consider its implications:

"So alarmed is the UN [by increased opium production in Afghanistan] that it is suggesting a remedy more radical than any that has been put forward before - bringing in US and British forces to fight a drugs war similar to the war on terror. It wants them to destroy farmers' crops on a massive scale before they can be harvested."

If there is anything more guaranteed to alienate the locals than that particular bone-headed suggestion, I can't think what it is. As to the wider point, it is only the 'war on drugs' that makes possible the super profits that make opium such a valuable currency for terrorists and other criminals. War against terror or war against drugs? You can't fight both, and I think that I know which one matters most.
http://www.nationalreview.com/thecorner/corner.asp



tmcgee
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-20-2004, 09:48 AM
Winston's Avatar
Winston Winston is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Fæyre Moünte
Posts: 2,537
Default

I agree. The war on drugs is a huge waste of time and money. Legalize it, regulate it... and tax the hell out of it. Bye-bye national debt!
__________________
"You can live to be a hundred if you give up all the things that make you want to live to be a hundred." — Woody Allen

(Avatar stolen from this nifty project.)
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-20-2004, 11:35 AM
chrissayer chrissayer is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Overbrook Farms
Posts: 8,542
Default

I'm curious, however. If you are all so opposed to the War on Drugs - and the Afghan situation is not falling under our (US) war on drugs, rather obviously, what is it that you all would do.

Afghanistan is, according to most sources, becoming an absolute heroin/opium narco-world. Should we simply turn away and say "farmers will be farmers, let them grow whatever they want."

I don't know what the answer is . . . but the problem is real, and simply spouting anti-UN jargon and saying the drug war sucks does not do alot to solve it.

Here's another take on it.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6520173/
__________________
“Cities have the capability of providing something for everybody, only because, and only when, they are created by everybody.” - Jane Jacobs
Reply With Quote

Advertisement

   
     
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Afghanistan: Legalize It eldondre The World 33 11-12-2007 09:40 PM
American Success Story - Afghanistan Is Now A Drug State chrissayer Politics 11 03-10-2005 06:12 PM
A father explains the Iraq War Ezra Politics 1 10-21-2004 09:51 AM
Osama Poll Ezra The Nation 81 10-18-2004 06:52 PM
Will you watch the presidential debates- why or why not? peacemover The Nation 26 10-01-2004 09:36 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.