PhillyBlog - Philadelphia  

Go Back   PhillyBlog - Philadelphia > Where We Are > The World
Blogs Map Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Google
 
Web www.phillyblog.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-26-2004, 08:35 AM
Ezra's Avatar
Ezra Ezra is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 4,192
Default Oil profits???

Please explain ... this quarter the top 5 oil companies are expected to post a 20 Billion dollar profit. Oil prices around the world are spiking so that the oil companies can post record profits???

http://edition.cnn.com/2004/BUSINESS/10/26/bp.reut/
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-26-2004, 09:06 PM
eldondre's Avatar
eldondre eldondre is online now
El Destructor II
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: 11th& Sansom
Posts: 23,309
Default Re: Oil profits???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ezra
Please explain ... this quarter the top 5 oil companies are expected to post a 20 Billion dollar profit. Oil prices around the world are spiking so that the oil companies can post record profits???

http://edition.cnn.com/2004/BUSINESS/10/26/bp.reut/
I'm not sure I follow. are you saying that oil prices are high so that oil co's can make money or that high oil prices mean that they are making bigger profits?
of course refining, which is more or less at fixed capacity, will run higher profits at higher prices. it is unusual that they will also be making higher profits on upstream too but like I said, refining capacity is constricted. what many conveniently forget is that the oil crash of 1984 (or so) sent th eoil/refining industries into a 15 plus year funk where littel profits were made...which is part of the reason refining capacity is so constricted. Second woudl be the environmental regulations requiredon new facilities both at the federal level but also because certain grades of gas have to be produced for certain regions/states which negates much of any economies of scale reached by any given facility. High profits now is a good thing as it will attract new entrants or motivate current players to expand capacity. At the same time, the government's role shoudl be makin gsure there is as little collusion as possible...at least on the refining end (since collusions is the rule for producers...OPEC). lastly, this should make any green liberal happy b/c nothing affects gas milage awareness like high gas prices.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-26-2004, 09:14 PM
mikeg's Avatar
mikeg mikeg is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Jefferson Square
Posts: 1,352
Default

Any possibility the run-up in oil has to do with US politics? Are there enough big-money players that would want to harm Bush's prospects of winning re-election that they would throw around huge sums of money to artificially inflate the oil market, or how about artificially deflate the stock market?

Just a thought, especially since Soros is a mega-billionaire who can move markets to some degree. If some larger players like foreign banks or other institutions were involved, could they move the markets to try to impact our election?
Reply With Quote

Advertisement

   
     
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2004, 06:08 AM
Ezra's Avatar
Ezra Ezra is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 4,192
Default

I don't understand why the American tax payer is being forced to directly give billions in profits to the oil companies.

Quote:
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Bush administration, faced with a growing insurgency and record fuel costs, plans early next year to seek $60 billion to $75 billion in emergency funding for military operations in Iraq (news - web sites) and Afghanistan (news - web sites), administration and congressional officials said on Tuesday.

The White House Office of Management and Budget said it was premature to discuss the size of the upcoming supplemental spending request, which would bring total U.S. funding for military operations and reconstruction efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan to as much as $280 billion.

Officials acknowledged that rising fuel costs could add billions of dollars to the price tag in Iraq. World oil prices have skyrocketed 70 percent since the start of the year, in part because of the turmoil in Iraq.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-28-2004, 12:21 AM
eldondre's Avatar
eldondre eldondre is online now
El Destructor II
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: 11th& Sansom
Posts: 23,309
Default

[quote="Ezra"]I don't understand why the American tax payer is being forced to directly give billions in profits to the oil companies.

Quote:
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Bush administration, faced with a growing insurgency and record fuel costs, plans early next year to seek $60 billion to $75 billion in emergency funding for military operations in Iraq (news - web sites) and Afghanistan (news - web sites), administration and congressional officials said on Tuesday.
nobody's forcing the taxpayer to give money away. when you choose to run tanks, convoys, etc you have to buy fuel. when you are the military you use taxpayer dollars. should you rather have our troops walk around, you will not have to purchase fuel from oil companies. capiche? I fail to see why the government shouldn't be subject to the same market constraints we are? if we weren't at war, this wouldn't be an issue.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-28-2004, 12:34 AM
hr's Avatar
hr hr is online now
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: South Philly
Posts: 2,426
Default Re: Oil profits???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ezra
Please explain ... this quarter the top 5 oil companies are expected to post a 20 Billion dollar profit. Oil prices around the world are spiking so that the oil companies can post record profits???

http://edition.cnn.com/2004/BUSINESS/10/26/bp.reut/
I think your question is best answered with your own words:

Ezra
Water Ice Vendor


Joined: 02 May 2004
Posts: 444
Location: Earth
Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2004 10:18 am Post subject: A question of money

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I know nothing of economics so bear that in mind if this sounds naive.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Realty speculators seek profits in Phila. seand General Discussion 16 07-05-2005 11:18 AM
the VP DEBATE shannie33 Politics 38 10-08-2004 02:50 PM
Federal Court Ok's Alabama's Ban on "Marital Aids" brooke The Nation 50 08-11-2004 01:48 PM
Kerry's tax plan eldondre The Nation 1 03-30-2004 12:08 AM
Beer drinkers wilreynolds Food and Drink 66 03-05-2004 12:16 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.