PhillyBlog - Philadelphia  

Go Back   PhillyBlog - Philadelphia > Where We Are > The World
Blogs Map Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Google
 
Web www.phillyblog.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 02-06-2007, 10:03 AM
dogghosts dogghosts is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 996
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BeckyJ View Post
There was never a *country* called Palestine. The British divided the Trans-Jordan into present-day Jordan, Israel, & what is now considered Palestine, the French divided their territory into present-day Lebanon & Syria. What Marclips stated about those Arab states (Jordan, Syria, Egypt) not allowing Palestinians to become citizens is true. *Israel* does allow those Palestinians that want to become citizens to do so. Get your facts straight before you start spouting falsehoods.

As for a brief history of the region by controlling power, check this out:

www.mapsofwar.com

Click on Imperial History of the Middle East (on the right hand side under Most Popular). Note that there was *never* any state called Palestine.

Never a country called Palistine? Boy are you brain washed . I guess Rand Mc Nally was wrong. All you need to do is find an old world Atlas , prior to 1948 and look at it and Ta Da there it is ,,,
You remind me of the Orwell book 1984. Truth speak. They change the books to fit what they want you to think and people only read the new and improved book so they believe the lie.
Do you really think that an Arab would be allowed to run for election for prime minister over there ? If so you live in a dream world.

Last edited by dogghosts : 02-06-2007 at 10:05 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 02-06-2007, 11:03 AM
WashWestDad WashWestDad is offline
Dragon Rider
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Center City
Posts: 3,699
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dogghosts View Post
Never a country called Palistine? Boy are you brain washed . I guess Rand Mc Nally was wrong. All you need to do is find an old world Atlas , prior to 1948 and look at it and Ta Da there it is ,,,

You remind me of the Orwell book 1984. Truth speak. They change the books to fit what they want you to think and people only read the new and improved book so they believe the lie.
While i happen to disagree with Becky's view of Palestine's history, you're being ridiculous in invoking Orwell. The history of Palestine is convoluted, and reasonable people can disagree. The atlases were not changed because of some Jewish conspiracy to erase the history of Palestine. They were changed because Palestine ceased to exist in 1949, according to the terms of the armistice between Israel and the Arab countries that attacked Israel.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dogghosts View Post
Do you really think that an Arab would be allowed to run for election for prime minister over there ? If so you live in a dream world.
Now you're twisting the argument. Becky and Marclips pointed out, correctly, that Palestinians have more rights in Israel (where they can become citizens) than in any of the neighboring Arab countries, where the Palestinians have been kept as "refugees" for two generations. The matter of a Palestinian becoming Israeli PM is a straw man. That's like asking whether Hanan Ashrawi could become Queen of Jordan.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 02-06-2007, 11:16 AM
beetroottop beetroottop is offline
Tastykake Maker
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: center city
Posts: 230
Default actions of terrorists

Quote:
To paint the picture as a simple case of long-time suppression by Israel and suggest Israel is to blame for the actions of terrorists (are you implying a justifcation for terrorism?) indicates an unwillingness or inability to understand the situation fully or fairly.
Arab terrorists would continue to exist if Israel was bombed off the earth today. These madmen hate the West and want to destroy all that is not Islamic. If these rabid murderers and sponsors[Iran/Syria etc.]get nuclear weapons they will use them against the West.
Reply With Quote

Advertisement

   
     
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 02-06-2007, 11:45 AM
Queen Villager Queen Villager is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,628
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by beetroottop View Post
Arab terrorists would continue to exist if Israel was bombed off the earth today. These madmen hate the West and want to destroy all that is not Islamic. If these rabid murderers and sponsors[Iran/Syria etc.]get nuclear weapons they will use them against the West.
Yep.

(And to paraphrase what an Al-Jazeera producer -- not a particularly pro-Israel guy -- said in the documentary about that network, if a water main breaks in Damascus, people will blame Israel.)
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 02-06-2007, 09:43 PM
eberger's Avatar
eberger eberger is offline
Tastykake Maker
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: High above Washington Sq!
Posts: 433
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aubin View Post
I mean, they did take these people's land and continue to do so. They occupy their towns, restrict their movement. When we invaded Germany, we left eventually. We didn't set up settlements and what not.
Any American who actually thinks this way should just turn their home over to the first Native American they see.

Throughout history land has changed hands by force. Not saying its right, but it is the way it is. What matters is how the occupiers treat the occupied citizens. IMO, I don't think that the Palestinian's have it all that bad over there. They just have to be good and productive citizens.
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 02-07-2007, 09:36 AM
geoffrobinson geoffrobinson is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,029
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by beetroottop View Post
Arab terrorists would continue to exist if Israel was bombed off the earth today. These madmen hate the West and want to destroy all that is not Islamic. If these rabid murderers and sponsors[Iran/Syria etc.]get nuclear weapons they will use them against the West.
Islamic terrorism exists in Germany, Spain, Phillipines, Pakistan, India, Southeast Asia, and Thailand. Just off the top of my head. Israel is an excuse.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 02-07-2007, 12:07 PM
WashWestDad WashWestDad is offline
Dragon Rider
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Center City
Posts: 3,699
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eberger View Post
IMO, I don't think that the Palestinian's have it all that bad over there. They just have to be good and productive citizens.
Um, let's not get carried away in our Israel-hugging. I'm quick to defend Israel from the attacks of anti-Semites (see above), but this statement is hard to justify. (I'm assuming that you are not talking about Israeli Arabs, but rather the folks in the West Bank and Gaza.) There is zero economic opportunity in the occupied territories. How on earth can Palestinians be "productive" when Israel restricts their movement and bulldozes their houses, and when Hamas and Fattah thugs are having gun battles in the streets? On the list of places i'd want to live, the West Bank is pretty freaking close to the bottom.

Places not to live
Darfur
North Korea
Baghdad
Somalia
West Bank/Gaza
Afghanistan
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 02-07-2007, 12:36 PM
geoffrobinson geoffrobinson is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,029
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WashWestDad View Post
Um, let's not get carried away in our Israel-hugging. I'm quick to defend Israel from the attacks of anti-Semites (see above), but this statement is hard to justify. (I'm assuming that you are not talking about Israeli Arabs, but rather the folks in the West Bank and Gaza.) There is zero economic opportunity in the occupied territories. How on earth can Palestinians be "productive" when Israel restricts their movement and bulldozes their houses, and when Hamas and Fattah thugs are having gun battles in the streets? On the list of places i'd want to live, the West Bank is pretty freaking close to the bottom.
Sort of a chicken and egg problem here. How can they not restrict their movement, etc. when there is so much violence and terrorism coming from those areas?
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 02-07-2007, 01:03 PM
five apples's Avatar
five apples five apples is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: P-Square
Posts: 1,258
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Queen Villager View Post
I didn't know CCP was banned. I know someone requested it. Are you sure he was banned?

CCP didn't merely bash Israel, he wrote vile, hateful, untruthful screeds about Jews, much of which had nothing to do with Israel.

There is a difference between legitimate criticism of actions that Israel takes and broad Israel-bashing, which usually is a very thin disguise for anti-Jewish feelings.

Many Americans are furious with our own government's actions but don't resort to wild, unbalanced accusations about the country itself or its citizens, or to demands that America cease to exist. We Americans don't much like it when people in other countries make sweeping, unsophisticated, angry claims about the U.S., rather than legitimate criticisms of actions our government takes.

The Israel-bashing that occurs on U.S. talk radio and blogs is full of uninformed, misguided, unbalanced, simplistic, often rabid animosity toward Israel, lacking in understanding -- or even an attempt at understanding -- the history and complex political situation.

I don't know you or your posts so am not saying you are anti-Semitic. You say you are not necessarily anti-Israel but make one-sided statements and comparisons about the country that don't apply or lack context. To paint the picture as a simple case of long-time suppression by Israel and suggest Israel is to blame for the actions of terrorists (are you implying a justifcation for terrorism?) indicates an unwillingness or inability to understand the situation fully or fairly.

(The U.S.-Germany situation bears no historical, military or political resemblance to the Israel-Palestine relationship. You might remember, however, that the U.S. maintains a large military presence in Germany more than half a century after WWII.)
Ok I should have known better then to post on this subject, but I would like to clarify my position unless i get branded a hateful anti-semetic. My point was, though poorly made, is that most pro israeli people equate any criticism of Israel as being antisemetic, no matter how truthfull it might be. Was CCP fair in what he said? No, the man is clearly a raving lunatic, and for the record I seconded his banning, though apparently that hasn't happened.

I think we could move much closer to peace in the Middle East if the Israelis accepted that they are not the only vicitims in this situation. Life in the occupied areas is horrible. Last time I checked unemployment hovered around 50%. You need a visa to travel from one town to the next. You get stopped over and over again on your way to work. Israeli forces regularly drop bombs on you trying to hit terrorist suspects. You also have no rights basically under israeli law.

Now, I also recognize that the Palestinians have much blame as well. Killing innocent people is never acceptable (actually i am a quaker so I don't believe any killing is ever acceptable) and terrorism is one of the great evils of our time. The palestinians actually had a chance at real peace but Arafat balked, for that he should always be remembered as a failure.

Well I rambled. To sum up, there is two sides of the story always, and peace will never be achieved if the two sides don't wake up and realize that. Criticism of Israel does not neccesarily equate to anti semitism, though Cookie Cutter's comments certainly did seem to be.

Ok, no more posting from me on this matter.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 02-07-2007, 02:25 PM
It'sJessMe's Avatar
It'sJessMe It'sJessMe is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: QV
Posts: 1,688
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aubin View Post
<snip> My point was, though poorly made, is that most pro israeli people equate any criticism of Israel as being antisemetic, no matter how truthfull it might be.<snip>
I don't think the "most" designation is quite fair. I agree with you that some people equate criticism with anti-semitism, but I've seen plenty of reasoned debate about the issue where people can, calmly and constructively, criticize some aspects of Israeli behavior while recognizing the positive of others, and hear nuanced commentary without branding the speaker.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.