PhillyBlog - Philadelphia  

Go Back   PhillyBlog - Philadelphia > Where We Are > The World
Blogs Map Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Google
 
Web www.phillyblog.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-10-2003, 03:05 PM
SteveJohnston SteveJohnston is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tullytown
Posts: 3,325
Default Dixie Chicks Radio Ban Cited At Senate Hearing

Dixie Chicks Radio Ban Cited At Senate Hearing
http://launch.yahoo.com/read/news.asp?contentID=214084

Quote:
(7/10/03, 7 a.m. ET) -- During a recent Senate hearing in Washington on radio consolidation, senators questioned an industry executive about his decision to ban Dixie Chicks songs from all Cumulus Media-owned radio stations. Committee chairman John McCain (R-Arizona) asked Lewis W. Dickey Jr. of Cumulus Media if he thought banning the Dixie Chicks from his stations reflected the current concern about media giants controlling the airwaves. Dickey replied that local listeners' objections to the Dixie Chicks were the reason for the 30-day ban. However, because of the criticism that followed the ban, Dickey said that in the future he would allow local stations to choose what to play.

In March Dixie Chicks lead singer and Texas-native Natalie Maines announced at a concert in England, "Just so you know, we're ashamed the president of the United States is from Texas." Shortly afterwards some radio station executives banned all Dixie Chicks songs for a month. Maines later apologized for her comments and admitted that she was being disrespectful.
Does this seem ridiculous to you or is this a real concern? Aren't individual businesses allowed to decide what they will and will not broadcast based upon their customer (Listener) feedback? I know that the local country station WXTU had a similar ban in effect. Are there any listeners to that station on the blog?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-10-2003, 04:40 PM
niel niel is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Fairmount
Posts: 9,459
Blog Entries: 1
Default Bans

It's a pretty clear example of what's wrong with media conglomeration - the political/ideological inclinations of one CEO are imposed on an entire region. What about Dixie Chicks fans who might have agreed with the sentiment about Bush?

When too few people make too many decisions about what we do and don't hear/see/read, we will miss stuff without even knowing it. Hell, I'm sure it's happening already.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-10-2003, 04:43 PM
SteveJohnston SteveJohnston is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tullytown
Posts: 3,325
Default

That is certainly a valid point. On the other hand, do you think that people who are famous really have a valid argument when the public does not support their works in response to their making their political stances known?
Reply With Quote

Advertisement

   
     
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-10-2003, 04:51 PM
niel niel is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Fairmount
Posts: 9,459
Blog Entries: 1
Default Politics & entertainment

I generally cringe when entertainers wear their politics on their sleeve. If it's integral to their art, that's fine, but to parade around like their opinions are somehow more significant because of their stature as performers (as though the two were intrinsically connected) is just stupid.

But it's irrelevant whether the majority agreed with them or no - the whole idea of "free speech" is to allow a diversity of opinions (and especially those that run counter to the majority's). But if too few people control most of the means of communication, there is de facto less free speech than before.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-10-2003, 04:53 PM
SteveJohnston SteveJohnston is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tullytown
Posts: 3,325
Default

That certainly makes sense if they are censored, but what if it is just the public outcry against their opinion?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-10-2003, 05:35 PM
zogby blob zogby blob is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 2,383
Default

The majority of country music fans were against them. The stations that stopped playing them were not the cross over stations that play country pop. It was the hard core country stations. Before the ban, the stations had tons of calls asking for it. The DC are a cross over act. Most of the people that agreed with them do not listen to country stations. They are not real country fans, just pop country, like Shania Twain.

It's just like anti-war protesters saying Bush wasn't listening to the majority. Being loudest doesn't make you the majority. Most Americans agree with W. But they are blind to the reality of the majority.
__________________
Jason
Lynn Swann 06'

"Individualism is absent when other peoples' standards, not reality and reason, are ones primary guide."
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Philadelphia's Internet Radio Station woowei Culture 1 05-16-2005 12:26 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.