Originally Posted by geoffrobinson

You shouldn't be teaching logic to your students. Santorum made a formally valid argument even if you disagree with it. And I have yet to see a good response to his argument. Primarily because those opposed to it don't understand the logical form of this type of argument.

Originally Posted by QVNewcomer

Surely you're smart enough to understand the fallacy of the slippery slope. there's no reason you couldn't allow one and still forbid the other.

Originally Posted by QVNewcomer

You mean this one: if we allow gay people to marry each other, next thing you know we'll have to allow people to marry animals, or inanimate objects?

Surely you're smart enough to understand the fallacy of the slippery slope. there's no reason you couldn't allow one and still forbid the other.

Plus, two adult homosexuals are both able to offer consent. Animals (and dishwashers) are not.

I assume you're just f-ing with me, though, and aren't really this dumb.

Edited to add: I meant "dishwashers" as in kitchen equipment, not the people who was dishes. Those people can f--k whoever they like.