Thought these points deserve their own thread:

"They are trying to acquire an adjacent parcel of land currently owned by the RDA and have agreed to provide an easement through that parcel to the SRDC if the RDA agrees to sell it to them, but they won't do anything to provide access across the railroad tracks.
A.


I hope that was in the letter of support which you all wrote them. I was at the meeting and what I heard, after they got done talking about "full disclosure" and then got caught not having disclosed that they are in negotiations for parcel #7, was that they refused to provide access through that parcel because of liability concerns. Is anyone from SOSNA or Failer's group planning to attend the ZBA meeting in order to assure that the variance is conditioned upon such access?
MFC

Quote:
Originally Posted by MFC
I hope that was in the letter of support which you all wrote them. I was at the meeting and what I heard, after they got done talking about "full disclosure" and then got caught not having disclosed that they are in negotiations for parcel #7, was that they refused to provide access through that parcel because of liability concerns. Is anyone from SOSNA or Failer's group planning to attend the ZBA meeting in order to assure that the variance is conditioned upon such access?


I thought you were planning to attend My understanding is that an easement for access is a condition the RDA is placing on their acquisition of the parcel. I haven't seen the zoning letter to know what's in it, but that's a good suggestion. AHB
ahbinpa"

2PM tommorrow 1515 Arch St., 15th Floor.