![]() |
|
|
|||
|
what a mess of a meeting.
i don't understand how people are being asked to vote on something in less than four weeks when they're not really sure vote they're voting for, or against. and why can't i vote on a queen village issue in queen village? seems like the elderly, who most likely aren't web-savvy and haven't seen any of the plans, are being cut out of the process altogether. the smugness from the front of the room was almost downright appalling. if they continue to stress how much they are a volunteer organization, and that is why they don't have their act together to where it should be, then why are they trying to put their hand in my pocket? this all seems 5 years (at least) too late anyway. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
http://www.phila.gov/citycouncil/dicicco/feedback.html BTW, despite being told that the NCD is a form of Neighborhood Improvement District, this simply cannot be the case. The NCD does not fit within the statutory definition of a NID, it is not run like an NID, and it does not meet the requirements of an NID. And if this is a first step to becoming a NID, we're screwed, because NIDs levy assessments and have pretty broad control over what goes on within their boundaries.
__________________
---Shosh |
|
||||
|
BTW, for those who want to file a formal objection with City Council (per the Notice), I used the following format:
-------------------- OBJECTION TO BILL NO. 080080 -- QUEEN VILLAGE NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION DISTRICT To: City Council Re: Bill No. 080080 Date: I, [name], own property located at [address], which property is within the boundaries of the proposed Queen Village Neighborhood Conservation District. I hereby register my OBJECTION to the creation of the Queen Village Neighborhood Conservation District. [signature] [contact information] ---------------- The objection is to be filed with the Clerk of the City Council, City Hall, Room 402.
__________________
---Shosh |
|
||||
|
According to the legislation, petitions with multiple signatures are also admissible.
__________________
Peter Cetera: Sometimes I just forget Say things I might regret It breaks my heart to see you crying |
|
|||
|
I was there as well and it was quite clearly a few residents trying to force their tastes on the neighborhood.
Aside from the procedure of this being total BS, I object to many tenants of the bill itself. First of all, most of it is irrelevant as zoning does or could dictate the same requirements. That said, the following provisions need to be removed in my opinion. 3 (b) The height restriction of 22 ft to the cornice line. I wouldn't mind this if there was an exception if a certain % of the houses on the block already exceeded that height. 4 (a) .1 - The requirement that a building with a frontage of more than 20ft have the facade broken into multiple planes and roofline variations. This is an attempt to dictate architectural design and is inappropriate. 4 (a) .3 - The banning of security grills. If a neighbor feels unsafe and deems them appropriate that should be their right. 4 (a) .10 (a-d) - Materials - This entire section should be stripped out of this bill. No one should have the right to dictate the materials that be used on private property. I don't like vinyl siding but if someone wants to use it so be it. Banning stucco, cement board, etc is an attempt to require all housing be brick. Trying to require the rear of someone's house match the front facade in certain cases is also ridiculous, as is dictating materials for the surface of a parking lot. Furthermore, it disgusted me that during their powerpoint slideshow they had the audacity to point out several houses and declare them "not appropriate for our neighborhood" simply because they did not like the architectural design or the modern materials used on the facades. 6 (a) .2 - Materials in commercial/industrial spaces - this bill requires that all industrial/commercial buildings use materials "consistent" with the nearby residential structures. ie - more brick. Commercial buildings need not, and probably should not be made to appear like a residential structure. There are a number of other minor details that I object to, but these are the biggest. I really think that the materials restrictions must be removed. Last edited by Tim K : 05-16-2008 at 03:18 PM. |
|
||||
|
My wife was still reeling from the fact that someone kept whispering "its a conservation district. How could people be against such a good thing like conservation?". F&ckin' spoonfed idiots. I now know how easily propaganda influences the masses.
__________________
Peter Cetera: Sometimes I just forget Say things I might regret It breaks my heart to see you crying |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Too bad she didn't have a copy of "1984" on hand!
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|