PhillyBlog - Philadelphia  

Go Back   PhillyBlog - Philadelphia > Where We Are > Queen Village / Bella Vista / Hawthorne
Blogs Map Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Google
 
Web www.phillyblog.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #91 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2008, 10:42 AM
BabbyKing BabbyKing is offline
Pretzel Vendor
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 9
Default

One must show up to show his or her dislike with the new proposed law. It is going to take a miracle to stop this from happening the way it looks. We must all show up in records.
Reply With Quote
  #92 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2008, 10:54 AM
Tim K Tim K is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,506
Default

Tell your friend/neighbors in Queen village to write to DiCicco. Tell them if they don't fight this legislation their neighbors will be determining what they can and cannot do to the exterior of their homes.....like living in a suburban development. The pro-NCD side likes to say that it will ONLY be triggered by a work permit or for new construction, but should you choose to repair the facade of your house, add or change a door/window....it kicks in and they can tell you what to do. As I see it this is just the first step and I don't want to let them get a foot in my door so to speak.

Imagine this scenario....you live in a brick house built in 1950. The brick facade is in really bad shape. The mason you hire tells you that he cannot repoint the brick because it is in such bad shape.

You have two options....replace the entire brick facade and spend in excess of $10,000 or spend 1/3rd of that and get a "nice" stucco job. Guess what, the NCD can require you to put a whole new brick facade on your house.

How about this one....you buy a nice lot in QV. You want to build a beautiful new contemporary home on YOUR PROPERTY. You want to use new, modern materials and windows. You can hire a world renowned architect to design it but guess what....the NCD will REQUIRE you to build a brick faux colonial house.
Reply With Quote
  #93 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2008, 11:10 AM
alesis's Avatar
alesis alesis is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cantfeedumdontbreedum, PA
Posts: 8,391
Default

TimK is always so nice about these things.

Not only can they tell you how to make your facade, they can keep you in months of paperwork just because you want planters, a mailbox, or heaven forbid-a dryer vent. Think it won't happen? I've already seen projects get extremely delayed because this or that boardmember doesn't like which side of the street a dryer vent is pointed; now with a law that carries some weight they'll definitely be up your @ss-and often it has nothing to do with architectural sense, and more to do with a nonsensical view by a qvna member or neighbor.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim K View Post
Tell your friend/neighbors in Queen village to write to DiCicco. Tell them if they don't fight this legislation their neighbors will be determining what they can and cannot do to the exterior of their homes.....like living in a suburban development. The pro-NCD side likes to say that it will ONLY be triggered by a work permit or for new construction, but should you choose to repair the facade of your house, add or change a door/window....it kicks in and they can tell you what to do. As I see it this is just the first step and I don't want to let them get a foot in my door so to speak.

Imagine this scenario....you live in a brick house built in 1950. The brick facade is in really bad shape. The mason you hire tells you that he cannot repoint the brick because it is in such bad shape.

You have two options....replace the entire brick facade and spend in excess of $10,000 or spend 1/3rd of that and get a "nice" stucco job. Guess what, the NCD can require you to put a whole new brick facade on your house.

How about this one....you buy a nice lot in QV. You want to build a beautiful new contemporary home on YOUR PROPERTY. You want to use new, modern materials and windows. You can hire a world renowned architect to design it but guess what....the NCD will REQUIRE you to build a brick faux colonial house.
__________________
Peter Cetera:
Sometimes I just forget
Say things I might regret
It breaks my heart to see you crying
Reply With Quote
  #94 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2008, 11:28 AM
alesis's Avatar
alesis alesis is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cantfeedumdontbreedum, PA
Posts: 8,391
Default

__________________
Peter Cetera:
Sometimes I just forget
Say things I might regret
It breaks my heart to see you crying
Reply With Quote
  #95 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2008, 11:41 AM
asg asg is offline
Pretzel Vendor
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 21
Default

alesis:

Will you be our William Wallace? If so, will you be providing blue war paint for tonight's meeting?
Reply With Quote
  #96 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2008, 11:49 AM
alesis's Avatar
alesis alesis is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cantfeedumdontbreedum, PA
Posts: 8,391
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by asg View Post
alesis:

Will you be our William Wallace? If so, will you be providing blue war paint for tonight's meeting?
I've already walked to italian market, procurred my blood, and I'm currently jumping around my house with warpaint, loincloth, and spear chanting "FREEEEEDOOOOOOMMMMMM" while my dog is howling.
__________________
Peter Cetera:
Sometimes I just forget
Say things I might regret
It breaks my heart to see you crying
Reply With Quote
  #97 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2008, 12:43 PM
BabbyKing BabbyKing is offline
Pretzel Vendor
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 9
Default

ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!

Maybe we should have Matt Cord announce the names of all the neighbors as they come through the doors, turn the lights down, etc...
Reply With Quote
  #98 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2008, 01:47 PM
random's Avatar
random random is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,455
Default

I think I've changed my mind from "against" to "open minded neutral."

I understand the arguments against.

But I also don't want blocks of garage front streets that evolve into the equivalent of back alleys, stucco replacing brick as the material of choice due to cost, the cheapest steel door anyone can lay hands on, etc. . . .

A city needs room to grow, but maybe it also needs to keep tabs on lowest common denominator or maximum developer profit at the expense of existing residents.

Private property rights are non-negotiable, sure. But that goes for all. We are all packed so tighly together in a city that what somebody wants to do with their private property will necessarily have an impact on everyone around them. Some things should fall into the "tough luck" pile but not everything.

For those so completely opposed to this, is there any common ground?
__________________


"It is my earnest hope - indeed the hope of all mankind - that from this solemn occasion a better world shall emerge out of the blood and carnage of the past, a world found upon faith and understanding, a world dedicated to the dignity of man and the fulfillment of his most cherished wish for freedom, tolerance and justice."

- General Douglas Macarthur
Supreme Allied Commander of South-West Pacific (1945)
Reply With Quote
  #99 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2008, 01:59 PM
Shosh's Avatar
Shosh Shosh is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Queen Village
Posts: 2,622
Blog Entries: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by random View Post
For those so completely opposed to this, is there any common ground?
Would I prefer that my neighbor's house not be stucco? Yes, although there are some really nice stucco/faux stone jobs around that I know look better than my facade. But a stucco front isn't a neighborhood-killer, nor are modern windows, etc. What does kill the feeling of Queen Village are the street-front garages that take up the entire facade, leaving no place for stoop-sitting, flower-boxes or anything that makes the area pedestrian-friendly.

So, to answer your question, I wouldn't oppose a simple regulation of garage-fronts. But as long as there are any provisions that go beyond that, I'm opposed.
__________________
---Shosh
Reply With Quote
  #100 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2008, 02:19 PM
alesis's Avatar
alesis alesis is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cantfeedumdontbreedum, PA
Posts: 8,391
Default

My neighbors could make their place a crack den which would bring values down.

My neighbors could become absentee landlords and rent to loud partying drunks which would bring values down.

My neighbors could stifle commercial growth making modern conveniences unavailable, which would bring values down.

My neighbors could become so uncultured and devoid of reality that they think its completely acceptable to use a kid's playground and tennis court as a toilet, which would bring values down.


Oh wait, all of that stuff has been going on for years and property values only went up. Why? Not because of some craptastic tyvek and plywood homes that are surfaced with brick tiles-instead it was due to the investments of many landowners who either retained their historic homes or took one of the many plots of empty land and converted it into a decent modern house.

Additionally, what do you think is going to happen when someone goes to make a window or door repair and is then confronted by QVNA watchdogs and certified letters from the planning commission? I know what I'd do...I'd say f*ck it and keep patching until it became so degraded that it absolutely needed replaced. The process is already long enough, and there's no way I'm going to L&I then QVNA then the planning commission then back to qvna then back to the planning commission just to eventually get a letter from a f&ckin' amateurish nimby who finally decides its ok for me to switch from an anderson to a pella door.

The compromise? QVNA has already controlled facades and their composition everytime building plans come up for review. Basically they say "either you use a red brick facade or were not approving the project". This stance has already caused parcels to go unpurchased, and other parts to go unrehabilitated. Having a formal law worsening this environment is only going to have negative effects.
Quote:
Originally Posted by random View Post
I think I've changed my mind from "against" to "open minded neutral."

I understand the arguments against.

But I also don't want blocks of garage front streets that evolve into the equivalent of back alleys, stucco replacing brick as the material of choice due to cost, the cheapest steel door anyone can lay hands on, etc. . . .

A city needs room to grow, but maybe it also needs to keep tabs on lowest common denominator or maximum developer profit at the expense of existing residents.

Private property rights are non-negotiable, sure. But that goes for all. We are all packed so tighly together in a city that what somebody wants to do with their private property will necessarily have an impact on everyone around them. Some things should fall into the "tough luck" pile but not everything.

For those so completely opposed to this, is there any common ground?
__________________
Peter Cetera:
Sometimes I just forget
Say things I might regret
It breaks my heart to see you crying
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.