Quote:
Originally Posted by Queen Villager
JoePSU: There is a wide socioeconomic gap between the higher-income Center City neighborhoods and most of the rest of Philadelphia. There aren't enough sledgehammers to flatten most of the city -- as if all the problems emanate from the poor -- while sparing the wealthy enclaves. Perhaps longer term, more constructive ideas are in order, not that I have the answers.
Alesis - I should have known I could count on you to take my remarks out of context, play up and mock the vandalized planter, disregard the reference to relatively recent assaults in Society Hill and misconstrue my point in mentioning the police/security guard actions.
|
If you think that the impoverished, underemployed, and state dependent residents of QV's housing projects do not disproportionately commit more crime and deteriorate quality of life in the neighborhood vs. the other residents, you are simply blind to reality.
Walk down Catharine Street between 2nd and 3rd, and you will see tree lined streets, with residents caring for their homes and apartments. Walk down Christian between 3rd and 5th, and you will see more litter in the streets, homeless sleeping on the ground, and nuissance restaurants and stores catering to unsupervised children at all hours of the night.
QV is generally a very nice, and well appointed neighborhood. The presence of the housing projects in it harms the surrounding blocks by providing a constant supply of drug traffic, unemployed and loitering men and women, and unwatched children, who otherwise would never be able to afford to live there.
Like it or not, we live in a world where the more money you have, the more you should expect from your living conditions and safety. The projects in QV disrupt that by creating conditions that foster the criminal element in very close proximity to the exact victim base the criminals want to exploit the most. It's like forcing chickens to live in a coop with a fox.
Being poor doesn't make one a criminal, but higher crime and violence against the more affluent is certainly a byproduct of unnaturally positioning people from opposite ends of the socio-economic spectrum together.