Inqlings: Alycia Lane about to walk free? - Page 2 - PhillyBlog

Voodoo · #11 (**permalink**) 02-26-2008, 02:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hospitalitygirl

Now, would anyone care to wager how long until her next screw?

If I have a choice, I prefer sooner rather than later.

TC08105 · #12 (**permalink**) 02-26-2008, 08:32 AM

It sure pays to have the right people on speed dial, doesn't it?

GMonkey · #13 (**permalink**) 02-26-2008, 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rabidog

i what to know what's going on with the perpetual 1980's newsanchor haircut. they all have them. seriously, i see plenty of professional, modern haircuts at my workplace... but what is with the giant wave of bangs on all newsanchors? this anchor is pretty but i'm too horribly distracted by this hairstyle i think i sported in 1987, when i was too young to know better. who is behind all this?

/my apologies to anyone if this actually IS a haircut routinely found in modern society, sported by you

Those really aren't true bangs...

Many tv personalities are sporting bangs, or some sort of face framing layers to disguise aging which is more obvious on HD. Bangs will instantly take 10 years off, if they are cut and worn correctly. Sadly, this is not a look for curly-haired women. Erin O'Hearn's hair is a bit too contrived. Her hairstylist probably just wants to do stuff to it to validate her employ. I bet that her hair looks great when she's not working.

It's a vast improvement over the Nancy Pelosi hair which many female news anchors have been sporting for the past 25 years.

GMonkey · #14 (**permalink**) 02-26-2008, 10:02 AM

Check out the most popular news anchor in Grand Rapids, MI. She's a sweet lady, but her hair has looked like this for the last 30 years.

http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:...snaps/geha.jpg

Philly.Man · #15 (**permalink**) 02-29-2008, 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zete_374

Weak point. If she is innocent of the charges then she did stay out of trouble. The DA is conceding that there isn't enough evidence to prove that she was guilty of a fracas. The incident is on film.

Actually, there is proof, but the DA decided that the injuries to the officer weren't severe enough to warrant an aggravated assault charge. However, under the law, there is no charge of simple assault when an officer is hit. The charge carries an aggravated assault charge, regardless of the severity of the injuries.
I guess that phone call to Fast Eddie helped more than we were led to believe.

Jayfar · #16 (**permalink**) 03-14-2008, 06:16 AM

She must wear a bushel basket as a jock strap.

Quote:

Posted on Fri, Mar. 14, 2008

Dan Gross: Alycia 's option: A $5M suit

She takes steps for future action against NYC, its police force and 9 officers

By Dan Gross
Philadelphia Daily News

ALYCIA LANE has filed a notice of claim in the New York City Comptroller's Office alerting the city to a potential future lawsuit seeking $5 million-plus from the City of New York, the New York Police Department and nine individual police officers.
According to New York

legal procedure, a party has 90 days from the date of an incident in which to file notice of claim. Lane would have one year and 10 days left to file a lawsuit.

The claim, filed March 6 by Lane and attorney David Smith, who represented her in her criminal hearing last month, names the city, the NYPD, Patrol Officer Bernadette Enchautegui - the officer Lane was charged with assaulting - as well as Patrol Officer Richard Lawrence. Other defendants are the integrity- control officer of New York's 10th Precinct and "John Does 1 to 6, representing several unidentified sergeants, lieutenants, and police officers of the NYPD 10th Precinct in their individual and official capacities."

[SNIP]

http://www.philly.com/dailynews/top_...__5M_suit.html

Mixiboi · #17 (**permalink**) 03-27-2008, 04:02 AM

http://www.philly.com/philly/enterta.../17008186.html

Quote:

THE LOCAL CHAPTER of the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists is trying to get Alycia Lane her CBS 3 anchoring job back. AFTRA filed a grievance over her January firing, charging that she had not been terminated properly by the station, says AFTRA counsel Jonathan Walters.

The matter is in arbitration, but no hearing has been set. "The relief sought by the union is her reinstatement because she was not fired properly," Walters said, declining to elaborate on how Lane's termination had been mishandled. A station source says that CBS 3 did not notify the union that Lane would be fired.

I say she is back on CBS 3 by May Sweeps...