PhillyBlog - Philadelphia  

Go Back   PhillyBlog - Philadelphia > Where We Are > Northeast Philly
Blogs Map Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Google
 
Web www.phillyblog.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-25-2008, 07:25 PM
NHA's Avatar
NHA NHA is offline
Tastykake Maker
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 194
Default Cancer Treatment Centers has growth spurt in Northwood

Quote:
Cancer Treatment Centers
has growth spurt in Northwood


June 19, 2008 edition

By Tom Waring
Times Staff Writer

Cancer Treatment Centers of America, which opened in December 2005 in the site of the former Parkview Hospital at 1331 E. Wyoming Ave., is a growing operation.

"The good news is business is good. The bad news is business is good," said John Goodchild, the center’s director of marketing.

Goodchild appeared at last week’s meeting of the Northwood Civic Association. He explained that the center has more than 500 stakeholders — its term for employees — and will increase the staff to 725.

The Eastern Regional Medical Center is the third for the company. The other hospitals are located in Illinois and Oklahoma.

The center is in a five-story building, with 85 percent of patients coming from outside the Philadelphia area.
According to Goodchild, the center wants to double capacity.

New to the first floor will be examination rooms, physicians offices and a PET/CT machine, an imaging tool that enables doctors to better pinpoint the location of cancer.

On the third floor, guest rooms for patients and their loved ones will be converted to inpatient beds.

New guest rooms will be built on the fourth and fifth floors, which are largely vacant. Guest rooms are for patients who are well enough not to be admitted to the hospital, but sick enough that they can’t stay on their own in a hotel room while undergoing radiation and chemotherapy.

In the future, the center would like to build a 100-bed guest quarters on a site close to the hospital. The plan is preliminary, with Goodchild saying only that the center is looking at "lots of alternatives."

In other news from the June 17 meeting:

• Assistant District Attorney Matt Mueller, who works for the Public Nuisance Task Force, encouraged residents to contact his office with complaints.

Generally, the task force handles drug houses and nuisance bars. It has the power to seize those properties by court action.

Mueller works closely with the 15th Police District and the city Department of Licenses and Inspections. He welcomes community input, including anonymous tips. The prosecutor urged neighbors to call 911 if they see a crime committed. Also, they can call him at 215-686-5857 or the hotline at 215-686-5858.

• Several people complained about interior and exterior work being done on a home on the 900 block of Fillmore St.
The property is located within the Burk Deed Restriction, which allows only single family homes.

"That’s our ace in the hole," said civic association president Barry Howell.

Neighbors worry that the owner is trying to convert the property into a duplex, triplex or business. The civic association contacted the office of City Councilman Darrell Clarke, and the Department of Licenses and Inspections served a "stop work" order.

A hearing is scheduled for July 22 in front of the Zoning Board of Adjustment.

Members vowed to attend the hearing to show their opposition. They will collect money to hire a lawyer for the day. They will also seek letters of opposition from Clarke and Dan Savage, a former city councilman who is Democratic leader of the 23rd Ward.

• The association will also look into a complaint by a resident that a makeshift car dealership is being operated on the 1100 block of Herbert St. The resident reports that mechanics work on cars and potential buyers test drive the vehicles.

• Northwood Civic Association will meet on Tuesday, July 15, at 7 p.m., at St. James Lutheran Church, at Castor Avenue and Pratt Street. ••

Reporter Tom Waring can be reached at 215-354-3034 or twaring@phillynews.com
What is an absolute fact and not a rumor, but did not appear in the paper nor did it get discussed in public, is the planned sale of a large portion of the Knights of Pythias Greenwood Cemetery for this "Growth Spurt."

This has been getting quietly discussed behind the scene for quite some time now.

The plan [this is just a brief outline and may be inaccurate, as I am not privy to all the information] involves the sale or transfer of the Cemetery Company's Stock of the majority shareholders, Willow Ridge Ltd., and perhaps the stock of the minority shareholders "Friends of Greenwood Cemetery Inc."

It also involves a plan to restore the historic vernacular style "Mansion" that was popular in 19th-century back to it's original condition. This house once belonged to Dr. Benjamin Rush, and served as his summer residence for over 11 years, between 1781 to 1792.

The plan also involves some unsavory work on a touchy subject.: the development of the course of action in the forthcoming disinterment that will be necessary to accomplish the CTA expansion.

The plan is much more complex than what I outlined above, but with Happy Historians, Good Politicians, Bias Orphans' Court Judges, Friendly Civic Associations, Fresh Money, Treatment for Cancer, and the need of Jobs For The Living, who wants to stop progress?

This "Frankford Story" may actually have a happy ending after all.
.
.
.
__________________
"What is History,' said Napoleon, 'but a fable agreed upon' - Ralph Waldo Emerson - 1848
"A Scottish philosopher once said that history is a set of lies agreed upon." - Enos Abijah Mills - 1920
"Napoleon said history is a set of lies agreed upon" - Modern day authors
"The exact contrary of what is generally believed is often the truth." - Jean de La Bruyère
Napoleon said none of the above. Tell me, what did Napoleon actually say about history?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-26-2008, 10:00 AM
cyainthehood cyainthehood is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,653
Default

IMO, this is good news.

Cancer Treatment Centers saved the Juniata/Northwood community from what is quite possibly going into Frankford hospital.

As long as whatever graves in the rear of the cemetery are disinterred respectfully, and find a new site where they can be marked, and actually visited, it seems like a win-win to me.

Hopefully there won't be a community battle over this.. and we have to watch CTC struggle with the decision to stay in Philly, or leave .. like FCCC.
__________________
United we stand. Divided we fall.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-26-2008, 03:56 PM
MyNorthwood.net MyNorthwood.net is offline
Tastykake Maker
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cyainthehood View Post
IMO, this is good news.

As long as whatever graves in the rear of the cemetery are disinterred respectfully, and find a new site where they can be marked, and actually visited, it seems like a win-win to me.

That depends upon how much one respects the deceased.

There is something sinister about the prospect of having one's remains disinterred, just to make room for an adjacent commercial operation.

Cemeteries are supposed to exist in perpetuity--they are not "vacant land reserves" that can be tapped for other use in the future.

Who would bury their dead if they knew that some future owner of the cemetery would one day sell off part of the land?

These sorts of deals set bad precedents. How long before other cemetery owners find that they, too, can find buyers for the land that was supposed to house the remains of the deceased?

There was a presumption, when those souls' remains were given their final resting place, that it would indeed be a FINAL resting place. The fact that they may not have living relatives located in this area anymore is completely immaterial--our society owes them the dignity of leaving their remains alone.

Given that the current owners of the cemetery are morticians, one would have thought that they would have been more sensitive to the need for respect of the deceased. If they were unwilling to continue administering the cemetery sans on-site funeral home, they could have turned the property over to the Friends of Greenwood (I am almost certain that I read somewhere that there was an agreement made between Willow Ridge and F.O.G. that, in the event of the court refusing to uphold the variance, the cemetery would be turned over to F.O.G.)

Disinterring remains is definitely something that should be discouraged--in all places and at all times.
__________________
_________________________
WORK HARD! Millions of welfare recipients are depending on you.

Last edited by MyNorthwood.net : 06-26-2008 at 04:03 PM.
Reply With Quote

Advertisement

   
     
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-26-2008, 04:06 PM
dawndelion dawndelion is offline
Pretzel Vendor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 86
Default

It is very unfortunate, but it seems to happen a lot. Wawa built a gas station over a cemetary on rte. 309 near Montgomeryville. At least CTC would be more beneficial to humanity than a gas station and convenience store.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06-26-2008, 04:15 PM
cyainthehood cyainthehood is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,653
Default

No one ever wants to see graves uprooted to make way for a commercial venture, however, I'm sure you'll agree, the conditions of the rear 30acres of Greenwood are hardly "respectable" by any stretch of the imagination.
These rear acres are not accessible. So, if you are unfortunate enough to have a loved one buried somewhere back there, forget about ever finding them.
The ground itself is so uneven, caskets jut out of the ground.
Even Friends of Greenwood could not possibly clear the overgrowth and make needed repairs to the ground and graves.

This is not a respectable final resting place for anyone.

Hopefully something can be worked out for all parties involved to give these unmarked, nameless souls a real resting place.
__________________
United we stand. Divided we fall.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-26-2008, 04:23 PM
Philde25's Avatar
Philde25 Philde25 is offline
Tastykake Maker
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Posts: 146
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dawndelion View Post
It is very unfortunate, but it seems to happen a lot. Wawa built a gas station over a cemetary on rte. 309 near Montgomeryville. At least CTC would be more beneficial to humanity than a gas station and convenience store.
Are you talking about the former graveyard at the intersection of 309 & 202 / Upper State Road, right by the Montgomery Mall? If so, there's currently no Wawa there. That's not to say someone else won't build a convenience store on it.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 06-26-2008, 04:51 PM
MyNorthwood.net MyNorthwood.net is offline
Tastykake Maker
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cyainthehood View Post
No one ever wants to see graves uprooted to make way for a commercial venture, however, I'm sure you'll agree, the conditions of the rear 30acres of Greenwood are hardly "respectable" by any stretch of the imagination.

This is not so simple a matter to decide. There are public policy issues at stake here.

Are we going to uproot graves whenever a well-financed buyer wants to take over some or all of a cemetery?

Do the deceased not have the right to rest in peace IN PERPETUITY?

Are there other options available to clean up a cemetery that has been allowed to fall into disrepair?

Can this decision be made by only one judge? Does the public not have a voice in this?

Can such a deal be made behind closed doors, with no accountability to the community or to the families of the deceased?

What safeguards will be in place to prevent this from becoming precedent-setting?

What, exactly, are cemeteries? Are they just parcels of land in out-of-the-way areas that can later be tapped for commercial expansion, at the expense of the interest of the deceased and thair families? Or are they areas that are SET ASIDE, IN PERPETUITY to hold the remains of those that have gone before us?

Society makes a commitment when it sets aside land for a cemetery--a commitment that endures down to succeeding generations. We should not be thinking about disturbing the remains of the dead, just so a commercial operator can expand its operation (and CCA is most definitely a COMMERCIAL operation.)

This is another Philadelphia trademark deal where everything has been worked out behind closed doors, before the citizenry was informed. It is no wonder that so many of Philadelphia's better families have just thrown up their hands and have moved away.
__________________
_________________________
WORK HARD! Millions of welfare recipients are depending on you.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 06-27-2008, 01:18 AM
NHA's Avatar
NHA NHA is offline
Tastykake Maker
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 194
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MyNorthwood.net View Post
This is not so simple a matter to decide. There are public policy issues at stake here. True

Are we going to uproot graves whenever a well-financed buyer wants to take over some or all of a cemetery? Apparently - Yes

Do the deceased not have the right to rest in peace IN PERPETUITY? Apparently Not!

Are there other options available to clean up a cemetery that has been allowed to fall into disrepair? Yes, those options were always available. What we are seeing today is profiteering as a result of a self imposed hardship. The hardship being intentionally keeping the cemetery in a state of disrepair in spite of always having the necessary funds to do otherwise. It's all part of a broken system.

Can this decision be made by only one judge? Apparently it can, and from the look at her other decisions concerning Greenwood, she already made up her mind long ago.!

Does the public not have a voice in this? That remains a rather puzzling question. I suppose it depends on the judge deciding on "who" is the public.

Can such a deal be made behind closed doors, with no accountability to the community or to the families of the deceased? Don't know yet, but it looks like everything is going as they planned.

What safeguards will be in place to prevent this from becoming precedent-setting? None

What, exactly, are cemeteries? Are they just parcels of land in out-of-the-way areas that can later be tapped for commercial expansion, at the expense of the interest of the deceased and thair families? Or are they areas that are SET ASIDE, IN PERPETUITY to hold the remains of those that have gone before us? YES, YES!

Society makes a commitment when it sets aside land for a cemetery--a commitment that endures down to succeeding generations. We should not be thinking about disturbing the remains of the dead, just so a commercial operator can expand its operation. That only happens in Norman Rockwell books for children with color crayons.

This is another Philadelphia trademark deal where everything has been worked out behind closed doors, before the citizenry was informed. It is no wonder that so many of Philadelphia's better families have just thrown up their hands and have moved away. It's the Trend of the future
It's not like it has not happened before.

All the grave stones from Monument Cemetery have been dumped as land fill at the foot of the Betsy Ross Bridge and Frankford Creek.
.
.
.
__________________
"What is History,' said Napoleon, 'but a fable agreed upon' - Ralph Waldo Emerson - 1848
"A Scottish philosopher once said that history is a set of lies agreed upon." - Enos Abijah Mills - 1920
"Napoleon said history is a set of lies agreed upon" - Modern day authors
"The exact contrary of what is generally believed is often the truth." - Jean de La Bruyère
Napoleon said none of the above. Tell me, what did Napoleon actually say about history?

Last edited by NHA : 06-27-2008 at 01:21 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 06-27-2008, 09:17 AM
Scoats's Avatar
Scoats Scoats is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Downtown Tacony
Posts: 2,057
Default

After decades of shady characters with their dodgy plans, this one at least seems respectable and beneficial.

I walked Greenwood a few summers ago. It was definitely fascinating, but was also very hopeless. Much like the mortal coils of those buried, much of Greenwood has returned to ashes and dust.

The dead obviously can't maintain the grounds and the living are disinterested. To be fair though, how many of us know where our great grandparents are buried?

Like it or not, societies have been building over cemeteries for centuries. Not to be disrespectful of the dead, but once you're dead, you're dead, and your rights pretty much go with you.
__________________
"Things are starting to get interesting right about now"

Scoats - publician, writer, artist.

All comments made by me on his board are given freely and probably worth what you paid for them.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 06-27-2008, 01:38 PM
marnie's Avatar
marnie marnie is offline
Tastykake Maker
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 414
Default

Not trying to be disrespectful of the dead, but doesn't anyone else feel that the "modern-day" burial is antiquated?

Embalming fluid (formaldehyde) doesn't biodegrade and pollutes the earth. This practice was started as a way to preserve soildiers remains until they could be shipped home.

Quote:
Like it or not, societies have been building over cemeteries for centuries. Not to be disrespectful of the dead, but once you're dead, you're dead, and your rights pretty much go with you.
I believe the Social Security building on Spring Garden Street is built over an old cemetery. How's that for irony?

I think we all kind of know where things should be heading:
Green Cemeteries Just my 2 cents worth.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.