PhillyBlog - Philadelphia  

Go Back   PhillyBlog - Philadelphia > Where We Are > Northeast Philly
Blogs Map Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Google
 
Web www.phillyblog.com

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 07-13-2007, 10:51 PM
Philly.Man Philly.Man is offline
Water Ice Vendor
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 863
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarketStEl View Post
In this case, Philly.Man, I wouldn't discount the evidence because of the source.

The National Association of Real Estate Boards (now called the National Association of Realtors) in 1920 or thereabouts recommended that its member boards urge agents to write racially restrictive covenants that ran with the land into deeds when property was sold. It also drew up a set of guidelines for mortgage bankers to use in determining whether to grant mortgages on properties. The formula used a number of factors, including age of the housing stock, average income levels in the vicinity, and racial composition of the neighborhood to rate properties on a scale from best to worst. The older the property, the poorer the neighborhood, and the higher the percentage of nonwhite inhabitants, the lower the property rating.

When the Federal Housing Administration (created in FDR's administration) began guaranteeing mortgages, it adopted the NAREB's guidelines as its own -- thus guaranteeing that the Northern urban neighborhoods to which blacks were flocking from the South would experience gradual disinvestment. And the NAREB -- and by extension the FHA -- continued to recommend that lenders not issue mortgages to properties without those covenants.

When the Supreme Court in 1948 ruled those covenants unenforceable in Shelley v. Kramer, the FHA gave the Realtors and the mortgage bankers two years to continue to write racism into sales transactions, announcing that they would no longer guarantee mortgages on properties sold subject to covenants after the middle of 1950.

Still, the NAREB's rating system survived this -- it wasn't until the Fair Housing Act of 1965 that it became illegal to discriminate on the basis of race in the selling of real estate or the issuing of mortgages.

Now, none of this even touches on those more recent phenomena you mentioned, namely, that of blacks and Latinos leaving the 'hood behind once they get enough Benjamins. That can be explained in terms of class aspirations and concerns for safety. The problem is -- and remains -- that even with all the real advances we've enjoyed since the 1960s, the effects of racist past actions work their way through the body politic and social in so many different ways that it becomes difficult at best to disentangle them from any actions that they might influence.

So it's okay for minorities to move out of neighborhoods for fears of safety or for advancement, but let a white person move and it's because the person moving on the block is a shade different. It's not so much about the color of skin, but how much color green is in someone's wallet. I don't care who moves next to me if they have the means to keep their property well kept and know how to be respectful to the block, but let someone, anyone, move next to me who lets their property sink or disrupts the quality of the block, and I'll have a problem with them. I'd take 10 minority families who are an asset to the block over one white family who is nothing but trash.

As for you quoting from sources from the 1920s through 1960s, that's like the republicans trying to blame the country's condition today on Clinton, and that was only 7 years ago.
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 07-13-2007, 11:11 PM
B-REAL B-REAL is offline
Tastykake Maker
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mayfair
Posts: 198
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marbugkid View Post
With any area, if you don't move, "they" cant move in. The point I'm trying to make is these problems were here LONG before "those people" started to move in. White trash has pleagued the NE for years...but NO ONE TALKS ABOUT IT....except in passing!

Murders aren't the only problem out there....and if you want to look at it your way, it's self elimination so as long as it's not an innocent bystander.....and don't factor age into that. Not every teenager shot is that innocent...you should know that.
Marburgkid,

I do understand the point you're trying to make and I agree to a point. There's a lot of white trash out there that cause problems like vandalism, theft, cursing in public in front of kids, drugs, alcoholism, etc... and it's existed in certain sections of the NE for years. Point well taken. However, your statement that "Murders aren't the only problem out there ..." can't be taken lightly because murder is the scariest thing out there. That and other violent crimes like assaults and rape.

I haven't come across anyone (at least in this thread) say anything about whites being better blacks or all blacks are criminals or any other ludicrous statements like that. All cultures and colors commit crimes; however, you can't deny that most of the dangerous and violent crimes occur in black neighborhoods.

It seems as if at least once a month (lately it seems like once a week) you hear about innocent bystanders getting killed in the crossfire of bullets. Kids on their bikes catching a bullet. Men getting ready for work in their own homes getting killed by a stray bullet finding a way into the wrong house. How often do you hear of that happening in white neighborhoods (please hold back on the Columbine statements. That was like 8 years ago and is the very rare exception, but people love to throw that at you when in a debate like this).

The problem is, black thugs will shoot their guns sideways on a street crowded with people to try to hit their targets. If you want to draw a comparison to the white Italian mafia, they would "take someone out" behind closed doors, not in front of children and grandmothers and everyone else. A murder is a murder. It still wrong no matter how it is committed; however, when shots ring out on a public street in the middle of the day, there's a whole lot more people at risk.

Marburgkid, if more people thought like you then neighborhoods probably wouldn't change or at least change as quickly. But don't berate people who "fled" neighborhoods that changed. Sure some people are ignorant, Archie Bunker types. But others are just trying to protect their families and get them in a better situation.

I don't know you're situation (marry, kids, whatever?) but do an honest assessment and think to yourself would you be OK with your 16 year old and 13 year old daughters hanging out at Tarken Playground or Lawncrest Rec or Levick & Algon or Levick & Oxford in the summer of 2007? Are you telling me that it's as safe now as it was in the summer of 1990? My opinion is "No way man".
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 07-13-2007, 11:44 PM
ACE ACE is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: LOWER MAYFAIR
Posts: 4,561
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by B-REAL View Post

I haven't come across anyone (at least in this thread) say anything about whites being better blacks or all blacks are criminals or any other ludicrous statements like that. All cultures and colors commit crimes; however, you can't deny that most of the dangerous and violent crimes occur in black neighborhoods.
That's an excellent point, B.

Advertisement

   
     
  #54 (permalink)  
Old 07-13-2007, 11:50 PM
Jenny's Avatar
Jenny Jenny is offline
Tastykake Maker
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 378
Default

B-Real,
Very well said. Why criticize people for trying to better themselves and families? Agreed about Tarken playground and many of the NE playgrounds/pools. Not safe.
  #55 (permalink)  
Old 07-13-2007, 11:53 PM
Noodles's Avatar
Noodles Noodles is offline
Water Ice Vendor
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 974
Default

Which begs the question why is Northeast Philadelphia attracting murdering , raping thugs and little else.
__________________
The post-Bush-Rove Republican Party is in the minority because it has driven away women, the young, suburbanites, black Americans, Latino-Americans, Asian-Americans, educated Americans, gay Americans and, increasingly, working-class Americans. Who’s left?

Frank Rich
The new York Times
  #56 (permalink)  
Old 07-14-2007, 12:02 AM
BigJim BigJim is offline
Pretzel Vendor
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 93
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Noodles View Post
Which begs the question why is Northeast Philadelphia attracting murdering , raping thugs and little else.
I guess there's not much left of North Philly..They have to go somewhere..
  #57 (permalink)  
Old 07-14-2007, 12:03 AM
Geno's Avatar
Geno Geno is offline
Consigliere
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lawndale/Upper Northwood?
Posts: 6,123
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Noodles View Post
Which begs the question why is Northeast Philadelphia attracting murdering , raping thugs and little else.
I wouldn't say that's true.
  #58 (permalink)  
Old 07-14-2007, 12:05 AM
Jenny's Avatar
Jenny Jenny is offline
Tastykake Maker
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 378
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Noodles View Post
Which begs the question why is Northeast Philadelphia attracting murdering , raping thugs and little else.

Maybe if they got JOBS they wouldn't have so much time on their hands...Big Jim is right, how many neighborhoods can they destroy? Soon there will be nothing left of the city.

Last edited by Jenny : 07-14-2007 at 12:11 AM.
  #59 (permalink)  
Old 07-14-2007, 12:16 AM
ACE ACE is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: LOWER MAYFAIR
Posts: 4,561
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Noodles View Post
Which begs the question why is Northeast Philadelphia attracting murdering , raping thugs and little else.
Because the non-murdering, raping people moved out because they had little kids. They figured this neighborhhod wouldn't see it another 10 years and then what? People don't want to move their children when they are teens.

B-Real brought to light that you can't allow your daughters or any teens at this point in any of these rec centers we all came up in. Now, why did the original folks move out that led to the people with young children to move out? Section 8.
  #60 (permalink)  
Old 07-14-2007, 12:21 AM
Jenny's Avatar
Jenny Jenny is offline
Tastykake Maker
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 378
Default

Look at the murder of the 15 year old in Tacony. Scary!
Closed Thread


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.