PhillyBlog - Philadelphia  

Go Back   PhillyBlog - Philadelphia > Where We Are > The Nation
Blogs Map Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Google
 
Web www.phillyblog.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #71 (permalink)  
Old 06-16-2008, 11:48 AM
Illiniwek's Avatar
Illiniwek Illiniwek is offline
Oskee Wow Wow
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Greater Logan Square Metropolitan Area
Posts: 5,341
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Illiniwek View Post
I was thinking res ipsa loquitur.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mars View Post
Methinks you are engaging once again in

Plausible deniability is when someone actively avoids gaining certain knowledge of facts because it benefits that person not to know.
Oh, I see. This is a helpful example of a non sequitur.

Is this going to be on the test?
Reply With Quote
  #72 (permalink)  
Old 06-16-2008, 11:52 AM
Mars's Avatar
Mars Mars is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,031
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Illiniwek View Post
Oh, I see. This is a helpful example of a non sequitur.

Is this going to be on the test?

Why not, since you need to refine your critical thinking skills . You would probably fail with flying colors anyway..red, white and blue ones at that....

Last edited by Mars : 06-16-2008 at 09:22 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #73 (permalink)  
Old 06-19-2008, 01:47 AM
Mars's Avatar
Mars Mars is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,031
Default General who probed Abu Ghraib says Bush officials committed war crimes

Quote:
Originally Posted by raider.adam View Post
Your views of the administration has no bearing on the case at hand. You are being silly.

sil·ly (sl)adj. sil·li·er, sil·li·est
1. Exhibiting a lack of wisdom or good sense; foolish. See Synonyms at foolish.
2. Lacking seriousness or responsibleness; frivolous:
Naive
1: marked by unaffected simplicity : artless, ingenuous2 a: deficient in worldly wisdom or informed judgment; especially : credulous


Quote:
WASHINGTON — The Army general who led the investigation into prisoner abuse at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison accused the Bush administration Wednesday of committing "war crimes" and called for those responsible to be held to account.

The remarks by Maj. Gen. Antonio Taguba, who's now retired, came in a new report that found that U.S. personnel tortured and abused detainees in Iraq, Afghanistan and Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, using beatings, electrical shocks, sexual humiliation and other cruel practices.

"After years of disclosures by government investigations, media accounts and reports from human rights organizations, there is no longer any doubt as to whether the current administration has committed war crimes," Taguba wrote. "The only question that remains to be answered is whether those who ordered the use of torture will be held to account."

Taguba, whose 2004 investigation documented chilling abuses at Abu Ghraib, is thought to be the most senior official to have accused the administration of war crimes. "The commander in chief and those under him authorized a systematic regime of torture," he wrote.

A White House spokeswoman, Kate Starr, had no comment.

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/244/story/41514.html
Reply With Quote

Advertisement

   
     
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.