![]() |
|
|
||||
|
So why are WE still waiting?
Franklin Delano Roosevelt's "Economic Bill of Rights": "It is our duty now to begin to lay the plans and determine the strategy for the winning of a lasting peace and the establishment of an American standard of living higher than ever before known. We cannot be content, no matter how high that general standard of living may be, if some fraction of our people-whether it be one-third or one-fifth or one-tenth-is ill-fed, ill-clothed, ill-housed, and insecure. This Republic had its beginning, and grew to its present strength, under the protection of certain inalienable political rights-among them the right of free speech, free press, free worship, trial by jury, freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures. They were our rights to life and liberty. As our nation has grown in size and stature, however-as our industrial economy expanded-these political rights proved inadequate to assure us equality in the pursuit of happiness. We have come to a clear realization of the fact that true individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence. "Necessitous men are not free men." People who are hungry and out of a job are the stuff of which dictatorships are made. In our day these economic truths have become accepted as self-evident. We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be established for all-regardless of station, race, or creed. Among these are: The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation; The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation; The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living; The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad; The right of every family to a decent home; The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health; The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment; The right to a good education. All of these rights spell security. And after this war is won we must be prepared to move forward, in the implementation of these rights, to new goals of human happiness and well-being. America's own rightful place in the world depends in large part upon how fully these and similar rights have been carried into practice for our citizens." There is some merit to the way in which FDR used the word liberalism as well though. When FDR used the word liberalism or when he described his policies as "liberal", what he meant was that private power was becoming anti-liberal. In other words, private power was becoming controlling. Wealthy capitalists had consolidated so much power in America that by government taking a "hands off" approach all it was doing was allowing these private institutions and individuals to dictate the country's economic conditions and thereby allowing these private entities to become controlling forces in people's lives. So, in that respect FDR saw his policies of taking some of that power away from the private institutions as "liberal" in the sense that is was restoring liberty to the common man. Extract from: Fascism Part II: The Rise of American Fascism Also read: Has Capitalism Failed? - Has Fascism Succeeded? Plot to overthrow President Franklin Delano Roosevelt. P.S. We are the ones we've been waiting for - The Elders, Oraibi, Arizona Hopi Nation Message delivered December 1999, on the eve of the new millennium. . . .
__________________
"What is History,' said Napoleon, 'but a fable agreed upon' - Ralph Waldo Emerson - 1848 "A Scottish philosopher once said that history is a set of lies agreed upon." - Enos Abijah Mills - 1920 "Napoleon said history is a set of lies agreed upon" - Modern day authors "The exact contrary of what is generally believed is often the truth." - Jean de La Bruyère Napoleon said none of the above. Tell me, what did Napoleon actually say about history? |
|
||||
|
FDR preferred the concentration of capital, as all command economists do. fewer players to control. He and his team were brilliant propagandists, but collapse in global trade led to a quarter of south philadelphians being out of work. why didn't he repeal hoover's disastrous smoot-hawley tariff? what did FDR do to protect small businesses from large monopolies? Interestingly, his solution to housing is part of what fueled the most recent housing boom (although it needed a partner in crime, the Fed).
__________________
"You down wit OPM?" Fumo: "Yeah, you know me!" |
| Advertisement | |||
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|