I've heard it said that it's the closest thing to a Divine Document crafted by the hand of man.
Is that what you mean?

__________________
The Lord is my light and my salvation; whom shall I fear? The Lord is the strength of my life; of whom shall I be afraid? - Psalm 27:1

and you wonder why people get hostile and start name calling.
go figure.

__________________


be aware that what the democrats say does not mean what it reads and what We perceive as to what THEY say is or isn't, is not what THEY mean. You dig....Great!

I'd rather have a 3rd term of Bush than a black Jimmy Carter. - copyright 2008 rpost


I love how some enlightened liberals have no problem censoring those with whom they disagree.

I don't have a problem with name-calling. Just make it inventive name-calling.

Your style of name-calling is just tired and broke-down, my friend.

__________________
[I][FONT=Helvetica][SIZE=-1][COLOR=#000000]"Some people, well, if they don't like Scientology, well, then, f**k you. Really. F**k you. Period."

-Tom Cruise
[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT][/I]

uh-huh whatever you say. It gets old when people such as yourself start the name calling.

__________________


be aware that what the democrats say does not mean what it reads and what We perceive as to what THEY say is or isn't, is not what THEY mean. You dig....Great!

I'd rather have a 3rd term of Bush than a black Jimmy Carter. - copyright 2008 rpost


I love how some enlightened liberals have no problem censoring those with whom they disagree.

another high-larious zinger!

__________________
[I][FONT=Helvetica][SIZE=-1][COLOR=#000000]"Some people, well, if they don't like Scientology, well, then, f**k you. Really. F**k you. Period."

-Tom Cruise
[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT][/I]

and again....another evading the question response.

__________________


be aware that what the democrats say does not mean what it reads and what We perceive as to what THEY say is or isn't, is not what THEY mean. You dig....Great!

I'd rather have a 3rd term of Bush than a black Jimmy Carter. - copyright 2008 rpost


I love how some enlightened liberals have no problem censoring those with whom they disagree.

What are Hillary Clinton's "qualifications"?

She claims to be Bill Clinton's 'wife'.

Obama will NEVER be Hillarys VP. These are just SOME of the reasons why:

Lesson one: A thief must never call the police to investigate anything.

Hillary Clinton’s campaign suggests that Senator Barack Obama is somehow corrupt because one of his former political donors, Chicago realtor, Tony Rezko is under trial for corruption.

To begin with, one of Senator Hillary Clinton’s past donors Norman Hsu, who gave her $850,000 was a corrupt embezzler who tried to flee and even attempted suicide in the midst of his own corruption trial last year.

Desperate, after Senator Obama had won 11 states in a row and built his insurmountable delegates count which now stands at 150, Senator Clinton decided to focus on sliming Obama. Now nothing is out of bounds.

Many people believe the name “Clinton” is synonymous with “Corruption.” A google search of “Clintons” and “scandal” yields 10,200,000 hits. A search of “Obamas” and “scandal” yields 1,570,000 hits.

The Clinton’s should be the last people to talk about corruption, scandals, and integrity. They are one of the most immoral, amoral, and perhaps corrupt political couples in history. While Senator Obama won’t bring up the issue, even after the Clintons continue “throwing the kitchen sink” at him, some politicians and major newspaper columnists are now beginning to raise questions.

This is what respected Obama supporter and former New Jersey senator Bill Bradley told PBS’s “Newshour,” this past Wednesday: "I think Barack Obama has a much stronger chance of beating John McCain in the general election. I think Hillary is flawed in many ways, and particularly if you look at her husband's unwillingness to release the names of the people who contributed to his presidential library. And the reason that is important -- you know, are there favors attached to $500,000 or $1 million contributions? And what do I mean by favors? I mean, pardons that are granted; investigations that are squelched; contracts that are awarded; regulations that are delayed. These are important questions. The people deserve to know. And we deserve, as Democrats, to know before a nominee is selected, because we don't want things to explode in a general election against John McCain."

The Wall Street Journal columnist Peggy Noonan, also writes that Hillary Clinton is “the most divisive figure in the country” and adds that people “have reason to view her as dark, dissembling, thuggish.” She also wonders: “Why aren’t we talking about impeachment, Whitewater and Osama?”

Noonan is obviously referring to the impeachment of Hillary Clinton’s husband, Bill Clinton, who was too busy molesting the intern Monica Lewinsky with a cigar when the red phone was ringing; and she is asking about the Whitewater land deal scandal that also involved the Clintons; and, finally she refers to the fact that commander in chief Bill Clinton waffled when he was provided intelligence of Osama bin Laden’s whereabouts, allowing him to escape.

Senator Clinton says she’s experienced having learned from her husband’s administration. That should be an excellent reason why she shouldn’t pick up the red phone at 3 AM.

What does all this have to do with the current presidential campaign? That’s the question senator Clinton should have done before she launched the “kitchen sink” attacks rather than sticking with the campaign issues.

Lesson two: If you have dirty underwear never call for underwear inspections.


Posted by: Martha Davidson | March 9, 2008 3:25 PM