Bloosum supports killing of innocent animals for food - Page 11 - PhillyBlog

RuggerAl · #**101** (**permalink**) 07-10-2007, 04:46 PM

RuggerAl do RuggerAl's part and no post here. RuggerAl not sad bloosum support killing innocent animals for food, because RuggerAl do too. RuggerAl also support killing guilty animals for food. Guilty animals are animals that kill other animals, so guessing mainly fish that eat other fish- salmon, tuna, etc. Most predators taste bad, so only eat grass eaters, who tend be innocent. Unless people who eat food are indeginous(sp) and eat what available, like snakes and coyotes. Those guilty animals too, as they only eat other animals (presumably other innocent animals).

Cheers,
RuggerAl like kill animals for food, best cook over naked fire-

Tannhauser · #**102** (**permalink**) 07-10-2007, 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tbdiscovery

It's really disheartening to know that Bloosum feels this way. It saddens me to be reminded of it with each new post.

Okay, I'm going to break my vow not to post here.
You know, at first I thought it was just a jab by Kent at Bloosum, saying she supported killing innocent animals, but for some reason, as the days went by, I began to become more and more convinced that she does. I don't know why, it's almost subliminal... Bloosum = animal killer.
And I too am saddened by this.

jizay · #**103** (**permalink**) 07-11-2007, 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tannhauser

Okay, I'm going to break my vow not to post here.
You know, at first I thought it was just a jab by Kent at Bloosum, saying she supported killing innocent animals, but for some reason, as the days went by, I began to become more and more convinced that she does. I don't know why, it's almost subliminal... Bloosum = animal killer.
And I too am saddened by this.

OK, now I'm going to break my vow not to post in response to Tanny breaking his. Just because you see Bloosum=animal killer every day because this thread keeps getting bumped again and again, it doesn't make it true. (Although, it doesn't make it false, either...) Let's not contribute to libel until the jury is in on Bloosum's animal killing. Let's recommit to not posting here so that this thread doesn't get bumped.

Tannhauser · #**104** (**permalink**) 07-11-2007, 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jizay

OK, now I'm going to break my vow not to post in response to Tanny breaking his. Just because you see Bloosum=animal killer every day because this thread keeps getting bumped again and again, it doesn't make it true. (Although, it doesn't make it false, either...) Let's not contribute to libel until the jury is in on Bloosum's animal killing. Let's recommit to not posting here so that this thread doesn't get bumped.

Hopefully this post won't bump the thread, but which one is slander and which one is libel?

jizay · #**105** (**permalink**) 07-11-2007, 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tannhauser

Hopefully this post won't bump the thread, but which one is slander and which one is libel?

Gee - now I'm not sure? Can anyone please advise. Do it in the thread, so everyone can see as a public service.

tbdiscovery · #**106** (**permalink**) 07-12-2007, 08:11 AM

Quote:

What is the Difference between Libel and Slander?
Libel usually takes the form of a written down statement injuring your reputation while slander is an oral expression. Libel can thus be thought of as defamation by sight while slander would be defamation conveyed by sound. However, most courts consider modern broadcasts, such as movies, television, and radio, as libel.

Why Does the Distinction Matter?

Damages in Defamation Cases – General damages may be awarded to a plaintiff if his reputation has been injured. In such case, the plaintiff is allowed to recover compensation without any proof beyond the defamatory nature of the statement(s). This compensation covers the emotional trauma and harm suffered by the plaintiff. Sometimes, however, the plaintiff must prove a specific type of loss in order to prevail. These are “special damages.” This includes specific economic losses, such as lost profits, that resulted from the defamation. These are often hard to prove. If the plaintiff can prove his special damages, he may then recover general damages. Whether a plaintiff must prove special damages depends on whether the defamation is considered libel or slander.
Libel and Libel Per Quod – Most courts allow any plaintiff claiming libel to recover general damages. These damages are presumed from the harm to the plaintiff’s reputation. Some states have made a distinction between libel per se (libel on its face) from libel per quod (requiring extrinsic evidence). For libel per quod, the plaintiff must show special damages unless the libel falls into a “slander per se” category.
Slander and Slander Per Se – If the defamation is characterized as slander, the plaintiff will most likely have to prove special damages. However, some statements are deemed so horrible that they are “slanderous per se,” requiring no additional proof of special damages. These include:
- Attacks on the plaintiff’s competence to perform adequately in his profession
- Claiming the plaintiff has a loathsome disease
- Alleging that the plaintiff has engaged in serious criminal misbehavior
- Suggesting a that a woman is immorally impure

http://www.legalmatch.com/law-librar...s-slander.html

MDBrownMSW · #**107** (**permalink**) 07-12-2007, 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tannhauser

Hopefully this post won't bump the thread, but which one is slander and which one is libel?

For it to be slander or libel, I think all of the following would have to be false:
- "bloosum" is not readily identifiable with a real person.
- you believe that bloosum supports killing innocent animals for food.
- bloosum supports killing innocent animals for food.
- this does not damage bloosum's reputation.

Now, back to this business about not posting to the thread: can someone tell me how I can make sure that I don't post to this thread? I mean, can I stop anytime I want, or do I need a 12 step program or something?

Tannhauser · #**108** (**permalink**) 07-12-2007, 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MDBrownMSW

...can someone tell me how I can make sure that I don't post to this thread? I mean, can I stop anytime I want, or do I need a 12 step program or something?

I think it’s actually fairly easy.

As the great philosopher Yoda said “Try not. Do... or do not. There is no try..”

I’m not posting to this thread anymore, that’s why I’m sending you this via private message.

Tannhauser · #**109** (**permalink**) 07-12-2007, 10:47 AM

Hey, did anyone realize that if you google bloosum, this thread with it’s accompanying upsetting title is the first thing that comes up?
I wonder why.

jizay · #**110** (**permalink**) 07-12-2007, 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tannhauser

Hey, did anyone realize that if you google bloosum, this thread with it’s accompanying upsetting title is the first thing that comes up?
I wonder why.

I'll tell you why: because we keep bumping it. Please, we have to sto - oh darn it, I did it again!