PhillyBlog - Philadelphia  

Go Back   PhillyBlog - Philadelphia > Where We Are > The Nation
Blogs Map Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Google
 
Web www.phillyblog.com

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2006, 05:42 PM
eldondre's Avatar
eldondre eldondre is offline
El Destructor II
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: 11th& Sansom
Posts: 22,852
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WashWestDad
We need to replace the population, either by birth or by immigration. If the government didn't encourage child-raising, fewer people would have kids. Then there wouldn't be enough people paying into Social Security to support your retirement. There wouldn't be enough kids to join the military and protect your withered retired ass from a Canadian invasion in 2056.
ah yes, you've hit the nail on the head. SS, at its heart, is a ponzi scheme. for those not familiar, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponzi
yes, as long as there are more suckers to pay, the system works. I aldo found it interesting that his company was named the SEC. anyways, there aren't too many suckers now who dream of getting SS (at least nto those under 35). at least not in any meaningful manner. besides, what's wrong with canadians? beer and dougnuts, now that's the way to retire. you can be damned sure scores will be built then.
__________________
"You down wit OPM?"
Fumo: "Yeah, you know me!"
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2006, 05:43 PM
NeedAHouse NeedAHouse is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,165
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WashWestDad
Income tax is progressive, so you're paying a greater share of income than the "deadbeat" making $25,000/year, whom we'll call Debbie.
Right...why is that fair?

Quote:
You're both paying a flat state tax and a flat city tax. Even tax burden.
I'm self employed. I pay more taxes.

Quote:
However, you're only paying FICA on the first $95k of your income, while Deadbeat Debbie is paying it on her whole salary. Bigger burden for her.
But that's not tax. That's social security insurance which I will be drawing down from in proportion to my contribution. Assuming it still exists. I'm still paying Medicare on the full amount and I don't even use Medicare.

Quote:
Debbie drives, so she's paying gas taxes.
Not the same as Federal Income Tax, which is what I was talking about. But even so. Don't drive. I don't. She can choose not to.

Quote:
You both pay sales tax, which is regressive (since Deadbeat Debbie is paying a greater share of her income than you are in sales tax). Bigger burden for her.
Again, not federal tax. And it's based on consumption. I can afford more so I spend more and therefore pay more sales tax.

Quote:
On balance, i'd say Debbie is pulling her weight.
No way. If Debbie, that whore, was pulling her weight, she wouldn't be getting tax breaks for having kids.
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2006, 05:58 PM
WashWestDad WashWestDad is offline
Dragon Rider
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Center City
Posts: 3,699
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NeedAHouse
Not the same as Federal Income Tax, which is what I was talking about. But even so. Don't drive. I don't. She can choose not to.

Again, not federal tax. And it's based on consumption. I can afford more so I spend more and therefore pay more sales tax.

No way. If Debbie, that whore, was pulling her weight, she wouldn't be getting tax breaks for having kids.
You started by talking about tax, now you want to specify federal tax. Who cares if it's going to DC, Harrisburg, or the Rick Mariano legal defense fund? It's still government taking money out of your and Debbie's pockets.

Were you raised in this country? If so, your parents got tax breaks for raising you. They used that money for something useful, like putting food in your mouth, putting clothes on your back and (apparently) sending you to charm school. Now it's time to pay your debt to society, sonny.

If you don't like it, quit your job and see if Deadbeat Debbie's company is hiring. Better yet, call Eldondre's HR office. I read in another thread that his employer pays him to sit around and post on the internets all day, probably while getting hot stone massages from foxy Canadian masseuses.

Advertisement

   
     
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2006, 06:07 PM
NeedAHouse NeedAHouse is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,165
Default

Oh...I get it. because Debbie decided to get married and knocked up and pop out a couple ankle biters after marrying Joe the blue collar shlub, they should get preferential treatment. That's bull. I see these lower middle class people going around, eating out at restaurants, sitting in the corner bar drinking their budweiser. I educated myself, worked hard, and made myself valuable enough to get paid more. I didn't do that so that I could pay a higher portion of my legitimately earned income to taxes. And even if you figure in all the other taxes besides federal income tax, I'm still paying more than them. Yet we reward these people with additional tax breaks for every kid they have. Why should they get subsidized for having kids while I can't even fully deduct charitable contributions anymore? Next year I'm going to have to pay AMT!!! And these baby machines get tax exemption after tax exemption. Not to mention family leave. Why does the gov't guarantee them their job back after 3 months off work? I want to go on a 1 month safari in Africa. But I'd be out of work when I got back. Not them. They get special treatment for popping out babies.
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2006, 06:07 PM
rhawnhurst diva's Avatar
rhawnhurst diva rhawnhurst diva is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,627
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NeedAHouse
But I'm taxed in the 98th percentile. There's no way I use more services than 98% of the population. I see these lower class people going to olive garden, or corner bars and spending money on that stuff. Why should I have to pay more so that they can go out to eat? They should have to pay just as much as me. It's not my fault they weren't as smart or didn't work as hard.

And not to mention the EXTRA tax break they get for having kids!! Why should they get rewarded for having more kids? I chose to be responsible and not have kids. Why should they get more money back? If they can't afford the kid without it, they shouldn't have one!
Welcome to the Single world. Yes, I'm in it too.
You even get a "marriage" discount on car insurance. ha ha

What can you do? Nothing. I live in the burbs now, and most of my real estate taxes go to schools. The most I can do is go vote no when they want to raise taxes for the school budget.

That's the way it is. I've come to accept it.
__________________
A happy person is not a person in a certain set of circumstances, but rather a person with a certain set of attitudes. - Hugh Downs
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2006, 06:14 PM
eldondre's Avatar
eldondre eldondre is offline
El Destructor II
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: 11th& Sansom
Posts: 22,852
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WashWestDad
If you don't like it, quit your job and see if Deadbeat Debbie's company is hiring. Better yet, call Eldondre's HR office. I read in another thread that his employer pays him to sit around and post on the internets all day, probably while getting hot stone massages from foxy Canadian masseuses.
et tu brute?. progressive? lol.
__________________
"You down wit OPM?"
Fumo: "Yeah, you know me!"

Last edited by eldondre : 05-09-2006 at 08:36 PM.
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2006, 06:15 PM
lynchman lynchman is offline
Tastykake Maker
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Mt. Airy
Posts: 295
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NeedAHouse
No one gave me anything. I worked for and earned everything I have. It's those people only paying 15% that are getting a gift. I'm a single guy living in an apartment without a car. How is it that I'm responsible for so much more in taxes than, say, a married mother who drives to work and whose kids are getting a free, public education? How is that fair? They should have to pay at least as much as me, no...more, as they are using more services.
So you supported yourself from child to adult? You must have been rather smart to be able to earn enough as a child to afford to send yourself to a private grade school and private high school since you didn't want to mooch off of the public school system. Then possibly pay for your own college too (since grants and scholarships are for those damn leeches too). That's pretty impressive.

Some people have to take what the public school system has (which is lacking because people who CAN support it don't want to support it). Then when they are old enough they may have to take responsibility rather than being selfish. Maybe they have to support kids, or siblings, or parents rather than going to college. So they take up multiple jobs just so their family can live and eat. Maybe they are not as smart as you. But as hard working? I seriously doubt that. There are many, many greuling jobs out there that pay crap. Try picking strawberries for a year for 2$ an hour. Then let me know if that's not as hard as whatever you do is.

It's called social responsibilty. You're bitching because you lose 33% of your $100,000+ income. That means you have $67,000 left over. The 'slacker' at the supermarket only gets to take home $21,250 of her $25,000 income (33% would mean she only takes home $16,750 a year - a much harder hit on her than it is on you). And don't forget, if it wasn't for her, you'd starve.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NeedAHouse
Earlier today I went to the grocery store. One of the workers was getting off her shift. Now I know she doesn't pay as much tax as me. And there she was, wearing LEVI jeans and buying non-generic cereal and boneless, skinless chicken breasts. What extravagance!!!!
Oh please. I got my Express jeans for 4$ at a thrift store. Supermarkets have sales on sh*t like cereal and chicken. 10$ for 10$ at Acme! But I guess you are too smart or rich for sales.
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2006, 06:24 PM
NeedAHouse NeedAHouse is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,165
Default

Sorry for sucking you guys in. I was playing Devil's Advocate. See this for explanation. Then the ElD and WSWDad can go on to explain to me how that's different (even though it isn't).

http://www.phillyblog.com/philly/sho...2&postcount=52
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2006, 06:29 PM
NeedAHouse NeedAHouse is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,165
Default

how the heck do I link to a post within a thread instead of just the single post, or just the entire thread. I know it can be done...I've seen it. Just can't figure it out.
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2006, 08:59 PM
eldondre's Avatar
eldondre eldondre is offline
El Destructor II
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: 11th& Sansom
Posts: 22,852
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NeedAHouse
Sorry for sucking you guys in. I was playing Devil's Advocate. See this for explanation. Then the ElD and WSWDad can go on to explain to me how that's different (even though it isn't).

http://www.phillyblog.com/philly/sho...2&postcount=52
huh?
seems like you were setting up a straw man rather than devil's advocate.
Quote:
Needahouse] No way. If Debbie, that whore, was pulling her weight, she wouldn't be getting tax breaks for having kids.
__________________
"You down wit OPM?"
Fumo: "Yeah, you know me!"
Closed Thread


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.