PhillyBlog - Philadelphia  

Go Back   PhillyBlog - Philadelphia > Where We Are > The Nation
Blogs Map Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Google
 
Web www.phillyblog.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 01-22-2004, 01:47 PM
peacemover's Avatar
peacemover peacemover is offline
Philly guy in the 'burbs
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 4,160
Default

I entirely agree with most of what has been said, except for Jason's grossly insensitive remarks- what a woman chooses to do with her body is her business. I believe there is not nearly enough education- both about contraception and abstinence, as well as supportive services for women who choose to have an abortion.

Keep it legal, protect womens' right to choose; but also offer substantive options and support for women and their significant others if desired.

I am male, but as I mentioned, I have spoken with numerous women who have had abortions and almost all of them had significant grief and emotional trauma and felt that there were not enough supportive services made available to them- or at least ones that they felt confident about utilizing.

I think this is changing, and more support is becoming available, but I do believe when we talk about abortion as an issue (whether we are male or female) we need to think about prevention and follow-up; and not just the act of abortion in and of itself.

Certainly I strongly support lobbying our elected officials and making it clear that abortion, in all of its forms needs to remain legal and safe- I'm just saying let's not forget about the emotional health and well-being of the women who get abortions.

My wife had to have an abortion done and one of her fallopian tubes removed because of an ectopic or tubal pregnancy that she could have died from. We were both grieved by this loss, and had been on an emotional roller coaster from being surprised that she was pregnant to being concerned for her health to being relieved that she would be okay to being grieved that the fetus- a potential human life was lost.

We both went for several months of intensive counseling as a couple that was tremendously helpful in the emotional healing process for us. I can't even imagine what it must be like for a woman to feel like she is bearing that grief all alone. Whether the pregnancy was planned or unplanned, wanted or unwanted it must be tremendously deep sense of grief mixed in with the relief that it was taken care of safely.

What are some of the supportive services available to women who have had abortions or are considering them? I know they are out there as far as support groups and the like, but what is available specifically for woman and possibly their partners in such situations? Perhaps some people here would find that information helpful.


Peace,

John
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 01-22-2004, 01:56 PM
IMPAQ IMPAQ is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,534
Default

I posted a blog on a free blog site (I don't know how to load up MT ) regarding this:

Quote:
Waste of Milk!

Waste of milk is a term my uncle uses and I think it serves it's purpose here in this situation. What a waste of milk some people are! I was driving down Rte. 1 to I-76E. I was wondering why there was a backup on the road. I finally hit the point where the Blvd turns into the Expressway and there were people standing outside with huge signs. It was a damn Pro-Life Rally! The people were out there in protest of the court decision that happened this week 31 years ago.

Now, I'm no big fan of protestors in general, but I am definitely not a fan of the pro-life cause. I may be fiscally conservative, but I am most certainly liberal on most social issues and I am extremely adamant about the Pro-Choice defense. I rather the mother realize she can't take the responsibility of a child and terminate the unwanted pregnancy before it turns into an unwanted child. My wife works for the foster care system and she sees thousands of "unwanted" children. The lives of those children were destroyed because their parents were too irresponsible to handle caring for them. Some of them were destroyed since birth due to drug abuse by the mother during the pregnancy. These poor children could've been spared the hurt and pain they have to face for the rest of their lives. For every successful story there are hundreds of other children that can't overcome the cards they've been dealt.

I just think these people should worry more about the living than the developing. Care for those children who have been placed in the foster system. Care for those children who have been addicted to crack and cocaine since birth. Show prisoners there's a better way to life and support their rehabilitation and reentrance into society. Help world hunger... starting right here in the States! Help the homeless. Help those addicted to drugs and alcohol. Help the unemployed find work. Help unskilled workers get the skills they need to succeed in the work place.

Gotdammit! There's so many other causes to latch on rather than to freeze your ass out there holding those disgusting and offensive pictures. The children heading off to school in the morning don't need to see that. It's an issue for adults to discuss. Do you think your "shock therapy" will change things? No. You're on the wrong side of the fence on this issue. This issue is bigger than a life lost. It's about a life saved. Some of those women who fess up and accept the fact that they are too irresponsible to care for the child (it takes a lot) are heroes in my book.

I respect those who act up and confess to their short comings rather than some self righteous soccer mom with 8 kids who thinks she's better than everyone else cause she never discovered birth control or some self righteous white male who never has nor ever will experience being pregnant.
__________________
CafeParents.com
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 01-22-2004, 01:59 PM
pcunicelli pcunicelli is offline
Tastykake Maker
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Philadelphia - Callowhill
Posts: 213
Default Re: Roe V. Wade 31 years later...

Hey John!

I have to say that I'm VERY pleasantly suprised to read your view on this!

I agree that it's the choice of the individual. I also agree that education is the key. But, teaching abstinence alone is like signing a death notice. Pregnancy is no longer the really big problem, but AIDS and other communicable diseases. Kids will be kids, they're going to have sex. If they don't know how to do it carefully, then that's our fault as parents.

A friend of mine had an awesome bumper sticker. It read: If you don't believe in abortion, then don't have one!

So simple, logical and right to the point.

Peter



Quote:
Originally Posted by peacemover
From the NY Times today:

Quote:
ON THIS DAY

On Jan. 22, 1973, in its Roe vs. Wade decision, the Supreme Court legalized abortions, using a trimester approach.
Where are we as a nation on the issue of abortion 31 yrs after this historic decision?

Personally I will weigh in to say that I believe abortion needs to remain legal, but much more needs to be done to offer education and resources to prevent unwanted pregnancies.

Peace,

J
Reply With Quote

Advertisement

   
     
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 01-22-2004, 02:00 PM
pcunicelli pcunicelli is offline
Tastykake Maker
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Philadelphia - Callowhill
Posts: 213
Default

Excellent Quote!

I prefer to refer to "them" as Anti-Choice people.


Quote:
Originally Posted by IMPAQ
I posted a blog on a free blog site (I don't know how to load up MT ) regarding this:

Quote:
Waste of Milk!

Waste of milk is a term my uncle uses and I think it serves it's purpose here in this situation. What a waste of milk some people are! I was driving down Rte. 1 to I-76E. I was wondering why there was a backup on the road. I finally hit the point where the Blvd turns into the Expressway and there were people standing outside with huge signs. It was a damn Pro-Life Rally! The people were out there in protest of the court decision that happened this week 31 years ago.

Now, I'm no big fan of protestors in general, but I am definitely not a fan of the pro-life cause. I may be fiscally conservative, but I am most certainly liberal on most social issues and I am extremely adamant about the Pro-Choice defense. I rather the mother realize she can't take the responsibility of a child and terminate the unwanted pregnancy before it turns into an unwanted child. My wife works for the foster care system and she sees thousands of "unwanted" children. The lives of those children were destroyed because their parents were too irresponsible to handle caring for them. Some of them were destroyed since birth due to drug abuse by the mother during the pregnancy. These poor children could've been spared the hurt and pain they have to face for the rest of their lives. For every successful story there are hundreds of other children that can't overcome the cards they've been dealt.

I just think these people should worry more about the living than the developing. Care for those children who have been placed in the foster system. Care for those children who have been addicted to crack and cocaine since birth. Show prisoners there's a better way to life and support their rehabilitation and reentrance into society. Help world hunger... starting right here in the States! Help the homeless. Help those addicted to drugs and alcohol. Help the unemployed find work. Help unskilled workers get the skills they need to succeed in the work place.

Gotdammit! There's so many other causes to latch on rather than to freeze your @ss out there holding those disgusting and offensive pictures. The children heading off to school in the morning don't need to see that. It's an issue for adults to discuss. Do you think your "shock therapy" will change things? No. You're on the wrong side of the fence on this issue. This issue is bigger than a life lost. It's about a life saved. Some of those women who fess up and accept the fact that they are too irresponsible to care for the child (it takes a lot) are heroes in my book.

I respect those who act up and confess to their short comings rather than some self righteous soccer mom with 8 kids who thinks she's better than everyone else cause she never discovered birth control or some self righteous white male who never has nor ever will experience being pregnant.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 01-22-2004, 08:15 PM
philsfan philsfan is offline
Pretzel Vendor
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 39
Default

i can not honestly believe what i'm reading. i happen to know plenty of women, (more women than men) who are pro-life. you have any kind of statistics to back up your claims? i guess its very scientific to go to a rally and just because you see more men then women you assume that its mostly just men who are pro-life.

i am an advocate for womens rights but i do not think this is a woman's right. i think this is a human rights issue. this issue has been perverted into a mask for people's own reasons for being "anti-life".

personally i think its absolutely barbaric that abortion can take place at any time during a pregnancy but especially right before birth. you mean to tell me that its just perfectly ok to go in and kill a baby 10 minutes before birth? are you human? i got a question for everyone... what difference does it make if you wait that extra ten minutes and kill the baby once it came out? can someone please tell me that? i mean that would be much safer for the woman. if you are concerned for the health and safety of the woman, you should be advocating for that too.

many of you will use the argument that you could not possibly support the baby once its born because of financial constraints or whatever reasoning you have... thats why you support abortion. i feel that it is a pitiful excuse. its a child... no matter which way you look at it. i guess i'm "anti-choice". i'm glad my parents were "anti-choice" and you can be thankful yours were too.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 01-22-2004, 08:29 PM
AJAX AJAX is offline
Pretzel Vendor
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: GERMANTOWN
Posts: 18
Default

Quote: "many of you will use the argument that you could not possibly support the baby once its born because of financial constraints or whatever reasoning you have... thats why you support abortion."

No, it's just not my friggin' business telling a another human being what they can or can't do with their body. I find it ironic that conservatives who typically favor smaller government and less government intervention into the lives of the citizens are the very ones trying to put "restraints" on a womans body, and her right to make personal decisions.
__________________
Capitalism is like an island of wealth, surrounded by a sea of poverty.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 01-22-2004, 08:41 PM
brooke's Avatar
brooke brooke is offline
Hostess With The Mostest
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Fishtown
Posts: 9,163
Default

Maybe you should educate yourself as to why partial birth abortions happen. They happen in very limited circumstances when it's risking the life of the woman to give birth. That's the difference. There other situation when abortions are done late term is when the baby is going to die either at birth or shortly thereafter. Frankly, I see these abortions as quite humane, regardless of whether one considers abortions overall to be murder or not.

Give babies the chance at life, you say? I've shared this story already on the blog, but I'll repeat it for you since you seem to believe that there is no justified abortion: My sister was born without bile ducts. She spent most of her little life in utter pain, intubated and dying. She lived about 9 months, during all of which she was in pain, and all of which the doctors knew she had no chance at life. Can you imagine watching a baby die? A baby you wanted, a baby with a name, a face, and your own baby? Can you imagine watching this little thing suffer for 9 whole months? Do you honestly think that people, as humane individuals, should force a child to be brought into the world like that? If my mother had known she would have been born like that, I'm most certain she would have had an abortion.

I should indeed be thankful my mother didn't abort me. Because my mother wanted me, so having an abortion would have obviously been a mistake for her. On the other hand, I can't imagine being brought into a world where I wasn't wanted.

I also can't imagine the world in which my great-grandmother grew up in where abortions were legal, and she watched one of her best friends bleed to death from an illegal abortion.

Indeed, there are plenty of women who are against abortion, but I assure you, philsfan, there are hardly any of them standing up picketing, blocking abortion clinics, and the like.
__________________
Resident of Fishtown, Moderator of Fish/No. Libs/Kenzo forum, Real Estate Agent-Prudential Fox & Roach
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 01-22-2004, 09:47 PM
Sponge Sponge is offline
Tastykake Maker
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 141
Default

I am anti-abortion, as a personal choice, but I acknowledge that it may make sense as an option for women in the case of rape, incest or the health of the mother. Other than that, I think that it is wrong.

I also think that unless it is one of the situations above, it should only be legal with the signed approval of the man who had sex with the woman in question. I will guess that I am in the minority, but this issue is just as much a men's issue as it is a woman's. After all, no man, no sex, no baby. I think that when you have sex with a man you make him part of the equation.
__________________
Sponge
----------
Soaking up intelligent commentary.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 01-22-2004, 10:06 PM
philsfan philsfan is offline
Pretzel Vendor
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 39
Default

Quote: No, it's just not my friggin' business telling a another human being what they can or can't do with their body. I find it ironic that conservatives who typically favor smaller government and less government intervention into the lives of the citizens are the very ones trying to put "restraints" on a womans body, and her right to make personal decisions.

you are limiting this to a conservatives? in general, liberals slant towards pro-choice but i know a whole lot of liberals who are pro-life and on the other hand, many conservatives who are pro-choice. this is NOT putting restraints on woman's body. this is a human's rights issue - i agree with sponge - the fetus is just as much his as hers and he should have equal say in whatever decision is made. and i love how you brand me as a conservative even though you know nothing about me. all you know is that im pro-life... very judgemental i see.

i am not against abortions in all cases. of course abortion should take place if the health of the mother is at stake. i'm just saying i think that its ridiculous to think that abortion is the result of the simple way out of an inconvient situation. and sponge, you may be in the minority on this board, but you are not in the country. the country is divided evenly in half, 50-50, in its stance on abortion.

i acknowledge that capitalism is not perfect, but can you tell me what other ideology out there is better at this point?
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 01-22-2004, 10:09 PM
pcunicelli pcunicelli is offline
Tastykake Maker
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Philadelphia - Callowhill
Posts: 213
Default

Well, that's the whole idea behind it being a choice.

As far as the father being part of the equation... I can see your point, but for the most part, it's not the man who's got to carry the baby, take care of it once it's born and raise it. It should remain the woman's choice.

If men got pregnant, abortion would be a constitutional amendment.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Sponge
I am anti-abortion, as a personal choice, but I acknowledge that it may make sense as an option for women in the case of rape, incest or the health of the mother. Other than that, I think that it is wrong.

I also think that unless it is one of the situations above, it should only be legal with the signed approval of the man who had sex with the woman in question. I will guess that I am in the minority, but this issue is just as much a men's issue as it is a woman's. After all, no man, no sex, no baby. I think that when you have sex with a man you make him part of the equation.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
30 years later, date of early human site in Pa. still debate SteveJohnston History and Tradition 16 07-05-2007 01:24 PM
Move bombing 20 years later seand University City / West Philadelphia 104 05-19-2005 02:50 AM
Manayunk: Sooo Last Year's Manayunk seand Manayunk / Roxborough / East Falls 40 11-23-2004 03:24 PM
BYE-BYE BOWA monavano Sports 26 10-09-2004 02:21 PM
Zell Miller jstauff Politics 46 09-24-2004 03:34 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.