PhillyBlog - Philadelphia  

Go Back   PhillyBlog - Philadelphia > Where We Are > General Discussion
Blogs Map Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Google
 
Web www.phillyblog.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #61 (permalink)  
Old 03-26-2007, 04:46 PM
Gekko Gekko is offline
Water Ice Vendor
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 681
Default

Malloy - of course it's never dropped 70%. What's your point? I'm not calling for a 70% correction. Anything over 1997 prices + 3.5% annual growth is too much to offer in my opinion. 3.5% is the long-term historical mean. Do the math.

Also - it's Arithmetic on the way down and geometric on the way up. If you lose 50 percent in a down market you need to then GAIN 100% in order to recoup your initial investment and break even.

$300,000 -50% = $150,000
$150,000 +50% = $225,000
$150,000 +100% = $300,000

An equivalent upside % does not offset an equivalent downside %.


Reply With Quote
  #62 (permalink)  
Old 03-26-2007, 05:05 PM
Malloy's Avatar
Malloy Malloy is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: East Falls
Posts: 12,853
Default

gekko: Say someone bought a 3br in Roxborough for $230k. Comps were in the 200-260 range based on condition. This home for $230k was mint, new kitchen.bathroom etc.

You are saying that homes are going to depreciate and fall below comps of say, 2006. How far will they drop?
Reply With Quote
  #63 (permalink)  
Old 03-26-2007, 05:25 PM
BigH BigH is offline
Tastykake Maker
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 155
Default

3rd,

we ran into the same argument last summer when I posted the thread "condo boom is almost over". At first I thought you were taking a low blow here, but now I think it's a great capitalistic post

just so I know where I stand in the 19106 and 19107 (I rent in 19107), what do you think the median and average household income is for the zips? We can even throw in 19103 for fun.

"tad over-inflated" is being a little optimistic. I don't think the market is going to collapse like gekko, but it certainly is going up much more in the near future.

Also, you should always make the distinction between being able to afford a place and the place being a good investment. I don't think a 2 BR for 400k in 19106 is a good investment right now. Call me risk averse, stupid for renting, etc... I'm leaning towards staying on the sidelines for one more year if I do not find the right place at my price.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3rd&Brown View Post
19106 and 19107 are two of the premier residential neighborhoods in the country, not just the city. For you to think that any Joe Schmoe should be able to afford 2 bedrooms in the middle of one of those two neighborhoods, you are smoking crack. While prices might be a tad over-inflated, you will never see a 2 bedroom in a quality building for that price again....and neither should you.

I hate to put you in your place. But, a lot of people in this city and this metro can afford 300K. If they couldn't, then you would see condos in your price range in the area that you want more often. 19106, especially Society Hill, has always been affluent (post Edmund Bacon). The people who live there aren't over-extended financially and I wouldn't expect a bunch of people to all of a sudden lose their shirts or to be willing to take a drastically lower price than the current market demands. If anything, prices in those zipcodes have accelerated of late, especially in older buildings, perhaps making up ground in prices between the old and new. Until 9 or so months ago, you could still get a one bedroom in the Society Hill Towers for less than $250,000 (on occasion). I'm not sure that's the case anymore.

It doesn't take a lot of income to afford that sort of mortgage. There are a lot of young professionals, dinks, and empty nesters who want to be where you want to be and are willing to sacrifice space for convenience. Hell, a lot of them are probably in a position to pay cash. Hence, the high price per square foot. Also, I'll venture a guess and say that most of them are secure financially and many probably make more money than you. They'll buy their condo, get on with their lives, and you can continue to sit on the sidelines.

Sure, don't overpay. However, with your list of demands, you are more likely going to have to live on the fringes of Center City rather than in it.
__________________
I am the walrus
Reply With Quote

Advertisement

   
     
  #64 (permalink)  
Old 03-26-2007, 05:29 PM
Gekko Gekko is offline
Water Ice Vendor
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 681
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malloy View Post
gekko: Say someone bought a 3br in Roxborough for $230k. Comps were in the 200-260 range based on condition. This home for $230k was mint, new kitchen.bathroom etc.

You are saying that homes are going to depreciate and fall below comps of say, 2006. How far will they drop?
how much did it sell for pre-1997? find that number and add in a 3.5% annual inflation rate. that's fair market value in my opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #65 (permalink)  
Old 03-26-2007, 05:30 PM
BigH BigH is offline
Tastykake Maker
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 155
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gekko View Post
Malloy - of course it's never dropped 70%. What's your point? I'm not calling for a 70% correction. Anything over 1997 prices + 3.5% annual growth is too much to offer in my opinion. 3.5% is the long-term historical mean. Do the math.

Also - it's Arithmetic on the way down and geometric on the way up. If you lose 50 percent in a down market you need to then GAIN 100% in order to recoup your initial investment and break even.

$300,000 -50% = $150,000
$150,000 +50% = $225,000
$150,000 +100% = $300,000

An equivalent upside % does not offset an equivalent downside %.

Gekko,
your analysis is flawed because the 3.5% historical is too low. You shoud see what the historical mean including the boom post 1997 and then calculate the STD. That would be a most realistic estimate of the downturn.

I've mentioned this before (and mean this sincerely): I don't you realize what would happen to the world economy if housing corrected by as much you claim. We are talking a depression (not recession).
__________________
I am the walrus
Reply With Quote
  #66 (permalink)  
Old 03-26-2007, 05:36 PM
Gekko Gekko is offline
Water Ice Vendor
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 681
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigH View Post
Gekko,
your analysis is flawed because the 3.5% historical is too low. You shoud see what the historical mean including the boom post 1997 and then calculate the STD. That would be a most realistic estimate of the downturn.

I've mentioned this before (and mean this sincerely): I don't you realize what would happen to the world economy if housing corrected by as much you claim. We are talking a depression (not recession).
3.5% is the historical mean which includes the post 1997 boom according to Yale Professor Robert Shiller in his book "Irrational Exuberance".

http://www.amazon.com/Irrational-Exu.../dp/0691050627

depression? no - where are you pulling this out of? What's your source? sounds like conjecture to me or an attempt to justify your purchase in that "it can never happen". depression is a little over-dramatic.

recession? perhaps - but it won't be the first nor the last if it happens. this is simply a market cycle. your problem (along with a lot of newbies) is that you are too young and youve never seen a down market cycle - but you will.
Reply With Quote
  #67 (permalink)  
Old 03-26-2007, 05:40 PM
Malloy's Avatar
Malloy Malloy is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: East Falls
Posts: 12,853
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gekko View Post
how much did it sell for pre-1997? find that number and add in a 3.5% annual inflation rate. that's fair market value in my opinion.
1997, $150k or so. (hopefully a realtor who is familiar witht the Rox market can chime in)

You are calling for that $250k home to drop ~$50k? When will this happen, 2009?
Reply With Quote
  #68 (permalink)  
Old 03-26-2007, 05:46 PM
BigH BigH is offline
Tastykake Maker
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 155
Default

you are right about that. I graduated college in 2003. The only downturn I experienced was a bad job market for grads in 2003 (unemployment was above 6%)


Quote:
Originally Posted by gekko View Post
3.5% is the historical mean which includes the post 1997 boom according to Yale Professor Robert Shiller in his book "Irrational Exuberance".

http://www.amazon.com/Irrational-Exu.../dp/0691050627

depression? no - where are you pulling this out of? What's your source? sounds like conjecture to me or an attempt to justify your purchase in that "it can never happen". depression is a little over-dramatic.

recession? perhaps - but it won't be the first nor the last if it happens. this is simply a market cycle. your problem (along with a lot of newbies) is that you are too young and youve never seen a down market cycle - but you will.
__________________
I am the walrus
Reply With Quote
  #69 (permalink)  
Old 03-26-2007, 05:49 PM
Gekko Gekko is offline
Water Ice Vendor
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 681
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malloy View Post
1997, $150k or so. (hopefully a realtor who is familiar witht the Rox market can chime in)

You are calling for that $250k home to drop ~$50k? When will this happen, 2009?
Start Amount $ 150,000
Rate3.50%
Years10
End Amount $ 211,590

When will it happen? Who knows but my guess it's already starting to happen. Unlike the stock market, housing is "sticky" on the way down. Transactions move slowly and people can "hang on" the way down as the stubbornly ride the market lower. I think that real price erosions started in late 2006 and will continue through 2007, 2008, and maybe 2009. History tells us that these cycles (both up and down) don't happen overnight - they take a while to play out. We are still in the early stages of this down cycle. "To every thing, there is a season."
Reply With Quote
  #70 (permalink)  
Old 03-26-2007, 05:51 PM
Gekko Gekko is offline
Water Ice Vendor
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 681
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigH View Post
you are right about that. I graduated college in 2003. The only downturn I experienced was a bad job market for grads in 2003 (unemployment was above 6%)
Read your history.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.