![]() |
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
Who do you think would buy at the price? It's a serious question. Who has the $$--yuppies, retirees? I've heard that this metro area has a considerable concentration of millionaires. Are they the ones? |
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Courage doesn't always roar. Sometimes courage is the quiet voice at the end of the day that says, "I will try again tomorrow." ---Mary Anne Radmacher |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
| Advertisement | |||
|
|
|||
|
My eyes and gut tell me that on the scale of 1 to 10 (10 being a boom market, 5 maintaining value, 1 losing value of over 5% annually), the real estate market in 19106 and 19107 is at about 4. However, april-june (peak season) will tell us if we're moving to a 3 or 5.
I guess I'm one of those yuppies looking to buy a place. I can afford a 2BR at 400k with a 2k/month mortgage, but I believe that it is way overpriced to pay in philly. I've been looking for a good value in the city (2BR, 950-1000 sq ft) in the low 300k without much luck. If I don't find it in april, I'm renewing my lease. I'd rather pay rent at $800 month in a building and apartment I love than make a bad 300k investment.
__________________
I am the walrus |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Last edited by Gekko : 03-25-2007 at 07:51 PM. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Apart from the posh spots like Rittenhouse, is that generally true? What do you guys think is the highest fair valuation for, say, a two-bedroom home with amenities? This can be a range, if that makes it easier to quantify. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
If I was talking fair value, I'd say that a 1000 sq ft. good condition (10 year old kitchen and bath) 2BR, should be priced around 310k-320k in 19106 or 19107 in a multi-unit condo building. Of course, you can't find anything at this price. Thus is my problem. Most developers and owner are expecting philly to sustain price per sq ft of 400 now and in the future in 19106 and 19107. I'm not buying that.
__________________
I am the walrus |
|
|||
|
Gekko,
you make a lot of good points, but there is no way prices will reach the level of 1997 +3.5% annual.
__________________
I am the walrus |
|
|||
|
Quote:
http://www.1stmillionat33.com/posts/.../house_his.gif http://www.nyse.tv/nasdaq-composite-history-chart.htm The end result you are trying to say is there are no more real estate and/or economic cycles. This you will find out for sure is a very incorrect assertion as all those dot com "newbies" before you that espoused "eyeballs" and the like found out. I could even conjecture that the cycles will be deeper than in the past. Last edited by Gekko : 03-25-2007 at 08:54 PM. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|