PhillyBlog - Philadelphia  

Go Back   PhillyBlog - Philadelphia > Where We Are > Center City
Blogs Map Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Google
 
Web www.phillyblog.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 07-31-2008, 08:25 PM
niel niel is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Fairmount
Posts: 9,431
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HowardBHaas View Post
There should be concern. Though spared from being acquired for Convention Center expansion, until the building is reused for a hotel or condos or offices, it will be at potential threat of being demolished for a modern replacement.
And the CC authority has shown itself to have not the slightest concern even for the promises it made before about preservation, like the fund they were supposed to contribute to to support preservation of the surrounding buildings.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 07-31-2008, 09:10 PM
HowardBHaas HowardBHaas is offline
Water Ice Vendor
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 639
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by niel View Post
And the CC authority has shown itself to have not the slightest concern even for the promises it made before about preservation, like the fund they were supposed to contribute to to support preservation of the surrounding buildings.
I will bet they used that fund to destroy the historic North Broad Street buildings of 111-115 North Broad. After all, that destruction wasn't in the original budget.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2008, 01:39 AM
Notcom's Avatar
Notcom Notcom is offline
Water Ice Vendor
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Waywestawestchesta
Posts: 816
Angry Libeler, libeler....post on fire

Quote:
Originally Posted by HowardBHaas View Post
I will bet they used that fund to destroy the historic North Broad Street buildings of 111-115 North Broad. After all, that destruction wasn't in the original budget.

Goodness HBH, you're being rather (and uncharacteristicly) daring with that accusation, dontyathink ?

I mean I tear Eddy to shreds with all kinds of horrific charges, some of them maybe - maybe - untrue, but that's OK 'cause I can pardon myself once I'm Governor .




Notcom for Governor '08
Impeach Rendell: shred 'im!! shred 'im !!!
__________________
In with the ingrate crowd .
Reply With Quote

Advertisement

   
     
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2008, 09:28 AM
HowardBHaas HowardBHaas is offline
Water Ice Vendor
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 639
Default

Now, now,

I don't know how these funds are being used. I was merely jesting.

I didn't mention or refer to the Governor!

Last edited by HowardBHaas : 08-01-2008 at 09:34 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2008, 10:14 AM
DCnPhilly's Avatar
DCnPhilly DCnPhilly is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chinatown-lite
Posts: 1,568
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HowardBHaas View Post
I will bet they used that fund to destroy the historic North Broad Street buildings of 111-115 North Broad. After all, that destruction wasn't in the original budget.
They're going to need the rest of that money to figure out what to do with the abcess left in the plans without those two buildings, which they still haven't figured out.
__________________
The idealistic are no longer concerned with influencing public opinion and creating a free world of responsible and ethical social choices, but rather imposing opinion through legislation, mandating these ethics, and outlawing choice in what the loudest sample finds offensive.

Ban the Bans. It's a slippery slope between Idealism and Fascism.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2008, 12:38 PM
zur's Avatar
zur zur is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: River Wards
Posts: 13,003
Blog Entries: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DCnPhilly View Post
They're going to need the rest of that money to figure out what to do with the abcess left in the plans without those two buildings, which they still haven't figured out.
Are you sure the haven't figured that out?




Are you sure they didn't already know of the deplorable conditions of these building and all the mold and massive water damage ..

...while they were designing the facade.
__________________
"
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2008, 01:13 PM
HowardBHaas HowardBHaas is offline
Water Ice Vendor
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 639
Default

111-115 North Broad Street were neglected while vacant. Only the frontages were to be incorporated, and could easily have been- as has been done worldwide with historic buildings.

At one time while contemplating destruction of those frontages despite the agreements reached with preservationists, the authorities proposed their replacement would be a pocket park. The pocket park would be in the shade, and so ideal for the homeless during the summer.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2008, 01:47 PM
DCnPhilly's Avatar
DCnPhilly DCnPhilly is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chinatown-lite
Posts: 1,568
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zur View Post
Are you sure the haven't figured that out?




Are you sure they didn't already know of the deplorable conditions of these building and all the mold and massive water damage ..

...while they were designing the facade.
Honestly I wasn't half as peeved about the buildings being torn down as I was about the sneaky backhanded way the state went about it. But that's Pennsylvania. Back room sleaze bags cutting corners to line their pockets. Buildings in far worse condition have been saved. Were these two buildings nearly as worthy as others that have been saved? Definitely not. Did they deserve the attention the Hysterical Society wanted them to have? Probably not. I don't doubt they knew from the beginning they were going to tear them down, but they should have gone about it with some level of tansparency. And if they did know all along the buildings were going, and it was considered in their plans, then they haven't released anything yet because all the renderings and floor plans still include those two buildings.
__________________
The idealistic are no longer concerned with influencing public opinion and creating a free world of responsible and ethical social choices, but rather imposing opinion through legislation, mandating these ethics, and outlawing choice in what the loudest sample finds offensive.

Ban the Bans. It's a slippery slope between Idealism and Fascism.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.