View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2008, 04:28 PM
random's Avatar
random random is offline
Cheesesteak GURU! Wiz with
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,348
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtairygirl View Post
so it's okay to rob a bank as long as a gun isn't used?
I was really starting to worry but thank God someone came along who has a working brain!

What this judge said confirms my worst suspicions. The gov't and a large segment of the public no longer really care all that much about crime or the criminals who commit it.

I have a news flash for the judge -- sentence criminals harshly and criminals who use guns even more harshly. No, you don't give a bonus for not using a gun as if that's some remarkably good conduct that deserves the judge's admiration. You do give the added penalty for using the gun.

We've arrived at a place where crime is so rampant that the judges are now proud of the criminals if they commit their crimes in a certain way? I don't think so.

Leniency for the guilty scum is punishment for the innocent victims.
__________________
"The period of the occupation will be much longer than that of the assault. Final judgment with respect to the job as a whole will probably be determined more by the reaction of public opinion throughout the world to the occupation than to the assault."

– Brigadier General Julius C. Holmes
Allied Forces Headquarters
4 March 1943

Last edited by random : 05-16-2008 at 04:30 PM.
Reply With Quote