Quote:
Originally Posted by john w k
Gee, now you are making things up about what I stated. I never even remotely suggested what you state above
|
That's exactly what you suggested. You said that courts should ignore the meaning of the actual text of the 14th amendment, which says absolutely nothing about it "applying only to race and color," and instead inject a bunch of extraneous extra-constitutional stuff.
Quote:
|
As to your “Theories of Constitutional Interpretation” which you linked to, that is just what they are, theories, and are relatively recent creations used to attack the most fundamental rule of constitutional law which I documented above.
|
Or, in other words, you're right about constitutional law, and every Supreme Court Judge and legal scholar over the past 100 years is an extremist who clearly got it wrong.
You asked for evidence, I gave you evidence. But since it contradicted your preconceived conclusions, you rejected it without even reading it.
Quote:
|
Too bad for you that you should ignore the most fundamental rule of constitution law, a rule which has over three hundred years of practice on American soil.
|
Psst, the constitution is only 219 years old. 